ArkotRamathorn
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 1,302
- Reaction score
- 317
the litmus test about mistakenly buying one product instead of the other is only 1 method of determining infringement
a customer drawing an association or assumption that the products are related or from the same company is also a factor
they are both in the exact same industry and now in the same markets doesn't help the case of W6th nor does the fact that MH has preceded them in the industry by 20 years
I should have put a disclaimer on what I was saying from the very beginning. I'm not arguing the legality of the lawsuit. I am arguing the logical-lity (yes, I said it) of the lawsuit (yes, it is Logical for MH to sue). But from a consumer standpoint, it just looks like a bigger richer guy is starting a lawyer slap fest with a smaller less rich guy.