- Joined
- Jan 23, 2008
- Messages
- 65,431
- Reaction score
- 10,794
You also basically said that wine wasn't considered "booze" back then. I have not heard this before. What would have been stronger than wine though? You have to distill to get stronger and they didn't start distilling until 200 AD.
No. I propose that society at large was not educated enough to discern between table drinks and "Booze". Or at least the time period, and understanding of when/how it occured. Only that they could drink what was needed and did not succumb to the drunken illness. This is another one of those things that is elusive in religious texts. How did they come to discern the difference between table drinks and these "Strong Drinks" and by what indication did they learn to avoid the latter.
Incidentally I just found out from Wikipedia that ancient Arabs were one of the first cultures to distill alcohol. I gotta wonder what went wrong between then and now!
That fool Kalil. Fvcker washed from the cistern water and pee'd in the baptismal. Turns out he'd just came from Alibaba's where he'd bought the house date juice without noticing it was 6 months past it's born on date.
So the congregation took an idea and organized it.
Later, soon as they brought him home to his wife, she beat the crap outta him with her sandals cause it was that or strangle his ass with her sarong but she sure as heck wasn't gonna strip down in front of his worthless friends.
So, the congreagation took an idea, and organized a punishment from it.
But, that high falootin' queen up the street wouldn't dare risk damaging her newest Prince Falood strapless on a drunken husband so, she grabbed the nearest thing she could throw.
So, a congregation took an idea, and drunkeness was met with stones.
I could be wrong tho'.