I did a valve adj on my 91 E34 M5 this summer as well (218k on this one)
View attachment 550018
We had an Audi Mk1 TT 2004 with the 1.8T quattro 222hp version and it was a maintenance fiend. The engine destroyed itself because of premature timing belt failure, which VAG was aware of. The result was a class action lawsuit for owners of the engine (A4, TT etc), what a mess. So that was a new engine, then had to rebuild the 6sp transmission, the welds at the exhaust expansion joint cracked, electrical issues, cluster issues, and much more. We are meticulous with maintenance and care, owning old BMW M5s, but from what other owners told me it was part of the deal. I thought the BMWs could be troublesome, well the Audi beat them in that respect.
That looks more like 21k than 218k!
My 2.7T Allroad had timing belt tensioner failure, which is pictured above. When I bought the car, I replaced the timing belt, 5 years and ~25k miles later the tensioner failed, timing slipped, and it bent valves. That was the end for me. Great car when it ran, and with good winter tires it was phenominal in the snow. One does not buy a used Allroad and expect reliability though. In fact, I expected the opposite and got it.
http://dougdemuro.kinja.com/german-reliability-the-greatest-myth-ever-sold-to-amer-1572026115
For this reason, I have taken to measuring automotive reliability on a scale I've dubbed the "Audi Allroad Scale Of Unreliability," which rates cars based on how close they are to the original Audi Allroad in terms of potential for random four-figure maintenance bills. For example: the Lexus ES300 is pretty low on the Audi Allroad Scale Of Unreliability. Whereas a vehicle made entirely by chimpanzees provided with random car parts would be almost as bad as the Allroad. Maybe even worse if the chimpanzees are German.