Incredible tests. Thank you. It reminded me that many homebrewers are engineers. I'm not. However, I do appreciate precision aligned with the goal/purpose. For me, this means is the beer within the limits of the style? Failing that, is it good tasting? So, I missed the IBUs and/or the FG by a few points. It matters little. Not to mention my first NEIPA that could have removed the paint off a car. Hey, it was hazy, had the right ABV made in New England. I excuse the debacle because it was the first time I used a hop shot. Have avoided them since. I've been using precision hydrometers and then a handheld refractometer that is difficult to read although I've gotten better at it. Right now I am awaiting the delivery today of an Amazon cheap digital refractometer like ShaneB mentioned. As with most processes in homebrewing and in brewing period, exact precision is not possible. There is always a range of time, temperature, water, crop variables, etc. The commercials are constantly testing and refining. That they produce a constant product over years, decades is amazing.
From time to time, I remind myself this is a hobby and not a commercial enterprise with stakeholders other than myself. So, I enjoy it and still fret over the missed whatevers.
David
Belgian style Witbier, NZ IPA, Chico clone fermenting
The refractometer came while posting. Another adventure begins.
From time to time, I remind myself this is a hobby and not a commercial enterprise with stakeholders other than myself. So, I enjoy it and still fret over the missed whatevers.

David
Belgian style Witbier, NZ IPA, Chico clone fermenting
The refractometer came while posting. Another adventure begins.
Last edited: