I had an issue when I first got my all in 1 prv and it was slowly leaking from the plunger that you push down to release pressure. I had to kinda mess with that plunger a little to get it to seal.
I had to take the ball lock post off the PRV a few times and retape it before i could get it to seal as well. Spraying with starsan always showed a very small leak until i got the thread tape just right.I had an issue when I first got my all in 1 prv and it was slowly leaking from the plunger that you push down to release pressure. I had to kinda mess with that plunger a little to get it to seal.
I did check that and when there is debris I clear it but it doesnt improve transfer much. I can barely see the level rise, never timed it but one keg takes at least 10-15 mins I think.I use ball lock connections as well when racking to kegs. I use gravity and the conical is under 10-12 psi. I use a jumper line (gas post on top of the fermenter to the gas post on keg) to equalize the pressure between the two vessels. My racking tubing is similar to yours… never had a problem. I would check to see if there is a blockage in the ball lock poppet. If some hop debris gets in there, the flow will slow or stop.
As @ShaLaH said, 10-15 minutes is fine -- high speed could involve foaming. In my experience, your "SUPER slow" speed is actually kinda fast and does not indicate a problem. With 5mm EVAbarrier and ball-locks, my transfer time (with keg and fermenter at the same level and only <5 psi added pressure) is more like 20 minutes.SUPER slow.
Yes, I use 2.5 gallon kegs and they are positioned lower than the racking arm. Maybe pull on the keg PRV to see if that helps. If it does, it might point to your spunding valve.I did check that and when there is debris I clear it but it doesnt improve transfer much. I can barely see the level rise, never timed it but one keg takes at least 10-15 mins I think.
Is your conical higher then your keg?
I'm thinking cause my racking arm is low and it has to push the beer up it makes it slower.
ok so it sounds like those lines are just very slow, the thing is when I transfer from a keg to a keg it goes much faster, I do however have filters in the kegs so perhaps I should test more with a filter in between.As @ShaLaH said, 10-15 minutes is fine -- high speed could involve foaming. In my experience, your "SUPER slow" speed is actually kinda fast and does not indicate a problem. With 5mm EVAbarrier and ball-locks, my transfer time (with keg and fermenter at the same level and only <5 psi added pressure) is more like 20 minutes.
Thanks for easing my paranoia, I thought the same thing, I'll be dryhopping later on so hopefully whatever minimal oxygen got in is not damaging the beer.I've unintentionally done the same thing, in fact wirh more than one bubble that went north after opening the dump valve. To my taste buds didn't impact anything.
If you think about a few large bubbles traveling up through the beer have so little surface area, they would not really oxygenate the beer. They would land in the conical headspace, which you could purge if you are worried about it.
What I've done more recently is to purge the setup below the dump valve with CO2 - even with 5-10 psi pressure on top I could not avoid some bubbles going up through the tank. So now it's just CO2 bubbles.
I have one but after dumping yeast there would be no point purging it as there is all beer in there.If you get a gas post to connect co2 to the bottom of your assembly you can put co2 pressure on it and loosen the clamp closest to your butterfly until it starts to let some pressure out, let it hiss fo a little while, that will purge as much oxygen as possible. That way you don't have all that good stuff sitting in the elbow and sight glass during fermentation.
Is there a reason for putting the butterfly valve at the top and not at the end? If you have any sealed sections with air it's going to be impossible to avoid oxygen ingress. I always put my valve at the end of the line and just let the trub fill the elbow.Hey all,
So I have maybe screwed up a batch just now in my conical and hoping for some feedback here.
I have a butterfly valve directly on the bottom of my conical, normally I dump from there but have just not changed to a diaphragm valve to control the dump speed better.
Now at day 7 I hooked it up as following
Butterfly valve -> elbow -> sightglass -> diaphragm valve - tubing thread out.
I was concerned that I would get a bubble floating into my tank as I opened the butterfly valve, but since I have about 4psi of pressure on the head of the tank left (not connected to gas), I was assuming that the bubble would come out through the bottom as I opened the diaphragm valve.
Once I cracked the butterfly valve however and started turning the diaphragm valve, I could hear a bubble escape into the tank.
I did not purge the new connected setup as I did not think there would be a bubble going into the tank with head pressure.
Did I not have enough pressure in order to prevent the bubble from escaping?
Should I have the diaphragm valve open when I crack the butterfly?
I hope this one bubble didnt wreck my beer, anyone has a similar experience? I'm leaving the beer on 21c for now hoping the yeast will absorb any DO that got into the beer.
Cheers everyone!
To not have dryhops drop in there and maximize contact.Is there a reason for putting the butterfly valve at the top and not at the end? If you have any sealed sections with air it's going to be impossible to avoid oxygen ingress. I always put my valve at the end of the line and just let the trub fill the elbow.
More inclined to keep it on from start and fill with wortCorrect yes, but what I was referring to is next time you set up this way to purge that section with co2 before dumping yeast. That way the little bubble that goes into your fermenter will be mostly co2 not oxygen.
I guess you will have to choose which bothers you more. I'm crazy about avoiding cold side oxidation and I have never had a problem with dry hop character.To not have dryhops drop in there and maximize contact.
Yes I need to drump to yeast as I do rouse and for me it made a big difference, got much more extraction so im definately planning on experimenting more with it, pressure and time.I guess you will have to choose which bothers you more. I'm crazy about avoiding cold side oxidation and I have never had a problem with dry hop character.
In some of the early posts on this thread users were using CO2 to rouse dry hops from the bottom up in to solution. I'm not sure how succesful this is in practice since in my experience anything that has dropped out quickly drops back out again. I tend not to dump my trub so that elbow is just full of trub and yeast cake and any dry hops wouldn't be in the elbow anyway. As was mentioned before, purging that space as best you can might at least mitigate some of the oxygen.
I stopped using the elbow, I have the butterfly valve and a hose barb fitting and just dump straight into a small bucket (I attach a short piece of tubing to the hose barb. I have not had any problems doing it this way without issue (though some type of valve that I could control the dump speed would be nice).Hey all,
So I have maybe screwed up a batch just now in my conical and hoping for some feedback here.
I have a butterfly valve directly on the bottom of my conical, normally I dump from there but have just not changed to a diaphragm valve to control the dump speed better.
Now at day 7 I hooked it up as following
Butterfly valve -> elbow -> sightglass -> diaphragm valve - tubing thread out.
I was concerned that I would get a bubble floating into my tank as I opened the butterfly valve, but since I have about 4psi of pressure on the head of the tank left (not connected to gas), I was assuming that the bubble would come out through the bottom as I opened the diaphragm valve.
Once I cracked the butterfly valve however and started turning the diaphragm valve, I could hear a bubble escape into the tank.
I did not purge the new connected setup as I did not think there would be a bubble going into the tank with head pressure.
Did I not have enough pressure in order to prevent the bubble from escaping?
Should I have the diaphragm valve open when I crack the butterfly?
I hope this one bubble didnt wreck my beer, anyone has a similar experience? I'm leaving the beer on 21c for now hoping the yeast will absorb any DO that got into the beer.
Cheers everyone!
Been working allright for me too but it does get messy at times and I feel like I could get better yields with the diaphragm valve.I stopped using the elbow, I have the butterfly valve and a hose barb fitting and just dump straight into a small bucket (I attach a short piece of tubing to the hose barb. I have not had any problems doing it this way without issue (though some type of valve that I could control the dump speed would be nice).
What I have found, that works well for me at least, has been to remove the elbow completely and similar to a few others go fermenter>valve>SG>valve>QD. This allows me to account for most situations.For those who are thinking to invest in a diaphragm valve here's my experience.
I only did 1 batch so far and have had a far less yield then before.
Reason being. Basically the diaphragma valve has the same problem as a direct butterfly, it's moving either too slow or not and then BOOM starts moving very fast, problem being you can't shut it very fast so you need to have another hand on the butterfly valve, I'd would say that just dumping straight from the butterfly valve would make more sense as I feel I can time it better and faster.
So far im not impressed with this thing but I will keep using it to see if I can learn to use it better.
Any comments techniques welcome if there are other uses of these types of valves.