• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

skimming before boil. anyone do it?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Shawn_Brewin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Messages
128
Reaction score
17
Location
Yellowknife NT, Canada
So I was brewing a batch of "Punkin Ale" this morning and I used leaf hops for the first time as my FWH and they seriously hindered m ability to skim the white head tht develops on the top of the kettle before boiling. I though to myself does it really make a difference? Then I really thought about it afterwards and I have never read anywhere, books, columns, webcasts, etc. That Stat this as a step in the brewing process.

I. Learned the process from a frind that taught m how to brew an he said he picked it up while brewing with a brewery in saskatchewan, Canada.

Does anyone else do this? Know why it is good/bad???
 
Break material settles out and is the trub etc you see when emptying the kettle and fermenters. I sometimes do it if bored, but don't try to.
 
I do every time 100%. Despite Brewlocifer's experiment that indicates otherwise I believe my beer has improved since I started the practice.
 
I skimmed when I started. Then stopped when I realized it was doing nothing for me. My beers are clean, crisp, and crystal clear (at least when I want them to be).
 
I skim the hotbreak if making a lager or hybrid.

Don't really have a good reason though. Something I read about traditional methods employed by German lager breweries.

A poor example of why to do something for sure. I do use a plate chiller and although I've never got a blockage from break material, the hot break does form large clumps and is easily removed avoiding it getting into my chiller.

Hot Break Removal

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php
 
It probably doesn't make a huge difference whether you skim or not but I feel it's just one of those little things that adds up overall to producing a great beer over just good beer. I get some small grain particles and flour with my system and skimming removes most of this.
 
I skim everytime, but mostly to avoid boil overs, and out of a sort of tradition/something to do while you stand there. The stuff will settle out in the break regardless.
 
I heard or read something a few years ago that suggested skimming would help prevent a boilover. It had something to do with not allowing the steam to escape or something. I'm not sure I buy that, however.

I do skim a little, if for no other reason than watching a pot come to a boil can be a little tedious.
 
Next up in the rabbit hole is removing krausen. Kaiser has an article about his experiences with it. I don't do it, that's for sure.
 
It sure is hard to find any compelling evidence to support the practice of skimming which i have used on my last 5 lager/hybrid beers.

Obstruction of plate chiller seems to be the main reason but there are simple ways to achieve this both at the homebrew scale and commercial scale without skimming.

Here is one publication which talks about alot of various chemical processes involved in brewing. Much of it is not applicable to homebrewing. It is heavy going and far from convincing.

In the paragraph below, the author talks about removing break material but is not specific about how it is removed. Later on in the publication, centrifuge and gravity assisted filtering is discussed.

Anyway here it is from this link for anyone who cares to peruse it. from page 454
__________________________________

Hot Break Formation. During boiling, two types of compounds are formed:
1. Compounds consisting of proteins and polyphenols, and compounds consisting of
proteins and oxidized polyphenols that are insoluble in hot wort and precipitate as
hot break;
2. Compounds formed from protein degradation products and polyphenols, which
remain in solution during boiling and only precipitate as cold break when the
wort is cooled (Kunze 1999).
Polyphenols are not directly involved in protein coagulation because protein–polyphenol
complexes are based on hydrogen bondings, which have only a very weak binding energy
at boiling temperatures and are unstable under these conditions (Miedaner 1986; Narziss
1992). Hot break formation is encouraged by longer boiling times, vigorous movement of
the boiling wort (which improves the reaction between proteins and polyphenols), and a
low pH, because the coagulation is best accomplished at the isoelectric point of the
proteins. To obtain a sufficient coagulation, a pH of 5.2 is recommended (Narziss 1992;
Kunze 1999). The isoelectric pH of some proteins – such as b-glubulins, d- and
1-hordein – is very low (pH 4.9) and cannot always be realized during wort boiling.
The removal of high-MW coagulable proteins is very important for the composition
and the quality of the finished beer. Insufficient coagulation and removal result in a
poor fermentation because the transport of substrates to and products from the yeast
cells is hindered by the hot break adsorbed on the yeast cell walls.
This leads to an insuffi-
cient pH drop during the primary fermentation and therefore to an incomplete elimination
of proteins during the main fermentation, followed by a poor clarification during storage.
This can result in a beer with a harsh bitterness (“protein bitterness”) and a poor colloidal
stability.


Sorry in advance big tme TL, DR.
 
While we're talking about skimming or stirring. When the hop material gets on the sides of the brew kettle, should you scrape it off and put it back into the boil?
 
Awesome guys/gals. It is Good to here that there is no significant difference in if you do it or not. I think it has become a tradition to me as of sorts so I will continue on with it. Can't hurt to remove some of the hot break. I really relate to the comments too about how it's just a good way to keep on eye on your boil. Never really have to worry about a boil over if you are standing there right before it happens with a spoon in your hand!
 
In my experience skimming seemed to lead to poor foam formation/retention in my beers especially low gravity ones. This is a very complicated and rather hot debate with many variables. There maybe an argument for skimming if you have clarity issues, however the use of finings, a good hot and cold break, grist composition, and
yeast selection has tended to improve the clarity issues of my brews.
Cheers,
weez
 
In my experience skimming seemed to lead to poor foam formation/retention in my beers especially low gravity ones. This is a very complicated and rather hot debate with many variables. There maybe an argument for skimming if you have clarity issues, however the use of finings, a good hot and cold break, grist composition, and
yeast selection has tended to improve the clarity issues of my brews.
Cheers,
weez
What do you think you would be removing from the beer that creates the head retention?
 
What do you think you would be removing from the beer that creates the head retention?

Yeah proteins.

From what I can tell, the only time you hear of someone advocating for skimming, it's all based off of that they "feel" it makes everything better.

As far as trub in the fermenter, all the people arguing for it point to Brulosopher's exbeeriments; while all of those opposed refer back to old homebrewing texts. The only thing I have seen that had some science to back it up was in one of the threads of the trub exbeeriments. The guy showed that in ligher, crisper, hoppier styles that high trub helped, but in maltier, darker, sweeter beers it had adverse effects. This article, which was very scientific in nature, convinced me enough.

Another really weird thing is that there was this Norwegian guy who found all of these farmhouse brewers that have their yeast and techniques passed down from generations and generations back. One guy he ended up brewing with skimmed the hot break as it occurred, and when asked why, responded with, "Now we're getting rid of the headache." Which he took to mean that skimming the hot break would help reduce the hangover headache.

With all of that said, I have started skimming on my more malt-forward, darker beers (brown and darker), but not on anything light and crisp and hop-forward. Unless I end up with a BK that's incredibly full. Then I will skim in order to avoid a boil-over.
 
The only proteins removed by skimming are coagulated ones. These are not playing any role in head retention. Your not going to get these proteins un-coagulated to contribute anything to the head, good or bad.

We've all seen coagulated proteins anytime we cook an egg. Good luck getting those un-coagulated.

Same with break material. You want it to form as it will leave clearer wort and beer. This is not the same as saying clear wort void of break material is important in the FV. This is saying that break formation is important.

Is break removal important prior to wort going to the FV? I don't know.

Ways to remove break include skimming, whirl pooling, passive settling and subsequent racking wort to FV.

I sure don't have any good reasons to support why I skim but it is certainly not because i am trying to avoid break in the FV. All the cold break goes in so that is not something I want to avoid or try to avoid. A pointless endeavor IMO.

Equally I don't believe break material to pose negative consequences for clarity, mouthfeel, flavor or head retention. I've not read anything that supports that on the homebrew scale.

Boil-overs are not a concern with my setup so no reason there either.

The hot break just bugs me when I see clumps getting sucked into my plate chiller. I'd sooner remove it as I have been via skimming. But I may well change if I grow weary of doing this light task.

Hot Break Skimming.jpg
 
To skim or not to skim that is the question. Not a closet skimmer only a former one, I gave it all up. Does all the hot break material that forms pre-boil coagulate and precipitate, i.e. if your not skimming or does some find its way dissolved in the wort?
I would not make the statement if you skim you will have poor foam formation/stability. When I started home brewing I never skimmed nobody ever told me I should. There were several years that went by that I didn't home brew got busy with life etc. When I started back I read or someone said to me that skimming was the in thing, all the cool kids are doing it. Makes sense the stuff is going end up on the bottom of the kettle why not throw it out up front. They use to call me super skim. I started brewing real low gravity really low hopped natural light wannabes for friends of mine and I started having problems with foam stability. I went back through a lot of old notes and realized that in the past when I didn't skim but had boil over I also had low head retention that lead me to stop skimming and hey all other things being equal the no foam problems went away for me.
I would say the skimming would reduce the overall trub though,preventing a boil over maybe maybe not.
Cheers,
weez
 
Back
Top