BrewDey
Well-Known Member
Isn't there an argument that: lack of secondary=more yeast in suspension=more potential for good bottle conditioning/carbonation?
I just bottled a sweet stout that had been in the primary for a month-it tasted pretty good at bottling (not very 'green' tasting, pretty smooth-just flat). I had wondered if enough yeast was left to carb it. Last night I saw some sediment in a bottle-so I know there's enough.
I used the same timeline (month primary->bottling) for a bigger IPA and it improved a ton once bottled-even though there was a decent amount of sediment. I guess for me one less step/chance for mishap is worth more sediment in the bottle.
I just bottled a sweet stout that had been in the primary for a month-it tasted pretty good at bottling (not very 'green' tasting, pretty smooth-just flat). I had wondered if enough yeast was left to carb it. Last night I saw some sediment in a bottle-so I know there's enough.
I used the same timeline (month primary->bottling) for a bigger IPA and it improved a ton once bottled-even though there was a decent amount of sediment. I guess for me one less step/chance for mishap is worth more sediment in the bottle.