Just started thinking about if scaling is an exact science or not. I've got a "pilot" brew in bottles right now for a beer I'm planning on brewing for a friend's wedding. I originally made the beer as a 25L batch. Thinking I would just multiply by 5 when I go to brew, and then just round off the numbers. My test batch was 8L, so I just scaled it down using beersmith.
But now I'm wondering if I can even do this scaling down and still get the same product since beersmith doesn't technically scale by the amount in the ingredients, but by the numbers that the ingredients should output (gravity, ibu, color, etc.). I know one aspect of scaling a recipe is knowing your new system's numbers, but as far as the ingredients go, how far off could the beer be if I simply multiply the 25L batch numbers by 5? Or should I take the time to make a new system profile at the larger scale, and just use the "stock" numbers from beersmith? which idea will likely get me closest to the actual beer I'm wanting?
I've never brewed on this system, although the guy I'm brewing with has done so for many years. But because it's not my system, I can't simply plug the numbers from the system into beersmith.
But now I'm wondering if I can even do this scaling down and still get the same product since beersmith doesn't technically scale by the amount in the ingredients, but by the numbers that the ingredients should output (gravity, ibu, color, etc.). I know one aspect of scaling a recipe is knowing your new system's numbers, but as far as the ingredients go, how far off could the beer be if I simply multiply the 25L batch numbers by 5? Or should I take the time to make a new system profile at the larger scale, and just use the "stock" numbers from beersmith? which idea will likely get me closest to the actual beer I'm wanting?
I've never brewed on this system, although the guy I'm brewing with has done so for many years. But because it's not my system, I can't simply plug the numbers from the system into beersmith.