Im going to do an experiment with my 8 QD's. Im going to change half to grey and keep half black. Than i will take two of the same pale or ambers and see if theres a difference in carbonation, clarity, etc...
I found the liquid side much quicker, however I WILL NOT Use the liquid side again! Let me preface that I was not thinking when I did the following, and I (stupidly) DO NOT have check valves on my manifold! I have a gas outlet between the regulator and the gas manifold, so I can easily purge kegs, bottles, etc.
The other day, shortly after I hooked up a newly kegged beer to the gas via the liquid post, I used the gas outlet to purge a carboy with CO2. Shortly after opening the valve on the outlet, beer started coming out of the gas tube purging my carboy! Yikes! If I hadn't had the gas connected to my liquid side, I wouldn't have had this issue.
So, I'd only recommend using the liquid side to force carb if you have check valves on your manifold.
I have two ways to carb up my beer, after much trial and error. One is the good old fashioned easy way- stick my beer in the keg, and my keg in the kegerator with the other kegs and put it on the gas (12 psi). In about 7-10 days, it's good but improves for about three more days.
If I'm in a huge hurry, I stick it in the kegerator at 30 psi for 36 hours, then purge and reset to the same as the rest of the kegs (12 psi). It's ready the next day.
I will never shake again as I've had a few foamy cloudy beers by doing so and I hate that. It also tends to have a carbonic acid "bite" from doing that.
The thing is, even in 10 days in the kegerator, the beer may still be a bit cloudy so I still like to wait until the beer is clear. The beer I'm drinking at this moment was kegged on Saturday, and it's pretty clear (and well carbed) but not 100% there yet. But I was desperate for homebrew as I was out, and the beer is a hoppy APA that is very good young. The yeast strain I used (Denny's favorite) is not flocculant, though, and it takes about 10 days at fridge temps to really clear. It's still good, but it's really not as good as it's going to be in about4 more days. I can't imagine drinking this beer 20 minutes after shaking it! It would be very cloudy, and there would be sediment in it. That's not something I want in my beer.
well the theory is that when gas slowly trickles into the dip tube on the liquid side, it bubbles up from the bottom and agitates the whole column of beer on its way up. it doesnt work nearly as well as if you were using a carbonation stone, the bubbles are too big. however the fact that it causes the beer to move around some would probably promote faster carbonation. how much faster than just putting gas in from the top? probably not too much. it might not even be a noticable difference, but the theory makes sense at least.
I'm thinking about getting one of the carbonating lids and giving it a ahot soon. If only for when I dknt have any carbonated kegs ready and a faucet runs dry.
I will never shake again as I've had a few foamy cloudy beers by doing so and I hate that. It also tends to have a carbonic acid "bite" from doing that.
The idea that forcing gas through the liquid diptube carbs your beer any faster is a myth. In fact, if you don't put pressurize the keg prior to connecting gas to the liquid post, it will actually force some of the residual CO2 out of solution and slow the carb process slightly.
If you're able to break the gas into super tiny bubbles through the use of something like an airstone, then pushing gas from the bottom of the keg will carb it much faster. The size of the bubbles coming through the liquid diptube however are so large that there's not appreciably more time or surface in contact with the gas than just using the gas diptube.
Since it takes extra time and effort, and make no difference in carbonation speed, I don't use the liquid post for carbonating, but to each their own. I have however bubbled gas through the liquid side while pulling the pressure relief valve to instantly degas overcarbonated kegs. It works like a charm.
The agitation actually knocks a tiny bit of CO2 out of solution. It's the increased surface area and contact time that's supposed to help speed the process. IMO whatever minor differences they make pretty much cancel each other out, and the beer carbonates at the same speed either way.
I bought an extra SS airstone when they went on clearance at my LHBS. I connected it to the gas post on one of my corny lids with about 20" of silicone tubing to make my own carb lid. I've only used it a couple times since I'm a fan of letting my beers condition with the set and forget method, but it will carb up a beer nicely in just a couple of days without any worry about overcarbing.
With 40k posts it's not that much of an honor.
![]()
if the keg is pressurized, nothing would be knocked out as there would be no where for it to go. however i do agree with:The agitation actually knocks a tiny bit of CO2 out of solution.
definately notDoes one method over the other effect head retention and stability?
Americans...no respect.
![]()
if the keg is pressurized, nothing would be knocked out as there would be no where for it to go. however i do agree with:
"if you don't put pressurize the keg prior to connecting gas to the liquid post, it will actually force some of the residual CO2 out of solution and slow the carb process slightly." (ever so slightly, but yes)
I just talked with a Pro brewer at a local brewpub and he told me he always connects the CO2 to the liquid side 30 PSI for 48 hours and then reattaches it to the gas side and then sets the PSI to serving volume for the particular style. He told me that way the gas goes down the dip tube to the bottom of the keg and gas bubbles float up to top. Never a bad beer!