zoebisch01 said:
Sorry man but we haven't. What we have been doing is genetic selection based on various properties that we like in a plant and want to encourage. We have not been hitting plants with radiation or gene splicing until somewhere in the 40's or 50's (radiation) and a later for the splicing. This is different. There are some serious issues related to the current GMO food that stretch far beyond just potential health problems (FDA has recalled stuff unfit for human consumption) including threatening open pollinated seed, and the encouragement of the liberal use of herbcides to name a few.
I will only comment one more time because this is well beyond the scope of this forum and this thread. I completely recognize that there are potential problems with the GMOs and without good science and reasonable testing problems could develop. I guess I am just not as fearful as the rest of you guys.
Genetic recombination is basically gene splicing...genes from one chromosome are moved to another, deleted, doubled, changed. And all that occurs naturally. If the mutation is to great the plant dies. Same in the GMO's. Radiation constantly effects plants in nature and they develop all kinds of ways to repair their DNA.
Two more things to say.
1. the problem comes when we put in DNA that creates enzymes that make toxic chemicals. The products of these enzymes which usually enhance the characteristics of the plant may be harmful to use. This is a problem and it is something researchers think about.
2. As long as there are no strange and untested chemicals being produced (they know exactly what they are making because they know what enzyme they are making) then the new DNA and the new protein pose not threat.
with a little basic digestion science you can see that the original DNA and proteins are destroyed before they entire the part of your body where they can do harm.
strange foreign DNA-->nucleic acids (harmless)-->absorption
strange weird funky protein or enzyme---> amino acids (harmless)--> absorption
our body knows better than to absorb these things in there existing condition
there will always be what-ifs...but i think as brewers we have to have the midset to overcome what if I did this wrong, what it my beer doesn't taste good, what are those crazy yeast doing in my beer that could give off all kinds of bad things, and try the final outcome because it may be just fine, and it may even be better than we could have ever expected.
cheers