The 12th bag is still as salty as ever .. and psycho

You invented that term. It really doesn't bother me. LOL.
What's with your almost obsessive insistence that I show you proof? Wiki is your friend. The burden of proof is not, nor has it ever been, mine.
There's another scandal that involves cheating with your team that has nothing to do with deflategate though, and there's plenty of publicly available evidence...
I have said all along deflate gate was nothing...other then amusing. But you guys just can't let it go even though it's going to go away all by itself.
Duh, it was how you knew for sure the Pats would win the Super Bowl before it happened. They went back to what worked and low and behold... The Lombardi is theirs again. Hey, if it ain't broke don't fix it... That said, the Colts blow anyway so not sure why they felt it necessary.and 100% of you Pats* fans like to confound he issue as though there's anything more to know than A) Pats cheated B) Pats got caught C) Pats gotted fined and penalized to the most extreme degree in NFL history.
To be fair, we kind of thought everyone considered it ubiquitous at this point. Like Romo choking in December or Auburn paying players.You keep saying the Pats are a cheating organization but never give backup.
You keep saying the Pats are a cheating organization but never give backup. I honestly don't care what you think about the Pats. You hate them because they are good, and that is fine. You just don't have proof to backup what you say which is why you keep skating around showing the proof. And yet again you prove me right. You have nothing besides the fact that you hate the Pats because they are so good.
And no I didn't invent the term...
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Bandwagon Hater
And what would this be? Let me guess, the only thing you have on the Pats, Spygate (which is still nothing)
ts:dr
Got on the hate the pats bandwagon in 1977. You may be too young or too stupid to remember those days....but refresher course: Pats were irrelevant because they hadn't institutionalized cheating yet.
Dumb as a rock and less entertaining.
If spygate was nothing, why the mega fines and vacated draft pick?
To be fair, we kind of thought everyone considered it ubiquitous at this point. Like Romo choking in December or Auburn paying players.
So, doing something against the rules isn't cheating? Okay. Keep justfying.....
Reading comprehension wasn't your strong point.
Again, was what the Patriots did regarding taping against the rules. It's a yes/no question.
Let's see how good your reading comprehension is.![]()
Fail.
Let's try it again. Yes, or no?
Fail.
Let's try it again. Yes, or no?
Because what they did was against the rulings. Doesn't mean what they did helped them more than what any other team did.
Again, 99% of you guys always bringing up Spygate don't even know what happened. All you know is "video taping".
The 12th bag is still as salty as ever .. and psycho
If spygate was nothing, why the mega fines and vacated draft pick?
Where are the sandy vags over the Bronco's titles?
Those fines and draft picks were less than half of what the Bronco's got for submitting false contracts to the league to avoid salary cap violations and keep both Elway and Davis on the team.
They were fined a shti-ton more than the Pats... and they won two Super Bowls.
The ridiculous gift of a catch that even put Seattle in a position to lose on the goal line? Is that the gift you speak of?
uh, they're right here....
v v v v v
Again, I didn't say that the Pats were the only team cheating. I didn't say they benefitted from spygate.
All I asked, and I'm still waiting for a yes/no, was taping the Jets signals from the sideline in 2007 against league rules?