My point is that given the parameters of the discussion, this particular variable is of in all likelihood, very little consequence when you stop for a minute and consider the chemistry of the final beer.
In my experience, this type of change has actually profoundly changed beers (with less flavor forward profiles - agreed) like blondes and lagers. So, just switching it up to see if impacts here too - without going to an extreme end and ending with a beer that is too far one way or the other. I tend to go more in measured steps in one direction instead of 10 steps all at once only to realize it was 4 steps too far.
This is a great, popular, and useful thread. I appreciate your efforts. Rather than just post pictures of my homebrew, I'm trying to add a different perspective to the actual brewing discussion as food for thought. Just consider it.
But, what is to be considered? You really only said - "don't bother." What is the suggestion?
I am definitely all for looking into a variety of methods and different approaches. I would genuinely be interested in your approach..... What do you do with a beer like this? Compare and contrast some approaches you have done and what you have or have not found.
If you were going to suggest a water profile/approach ( or multiple profiles leading to successful out comes that are different from one another........ i.e.. "full/rounded" or "dry/assertive" etc..... ) what have you had success with? Or, failures with? To me, that is food for thought and something I would certainly consider - probably even brew to see what I thought as well.
