For the record, my experience is with liquid Lutra culture and repitches of it.My experience was with the dried lutra. Are you using the liquid culture? That might be they key also.
For the record, my experience is with liquid Lutra culture and repitches of it.My experience was with the dried lutra. Are you using the liquid culture? That might be they key also.
Such different results from the same yeast ... makes one wonder if there's some interaction between lutra and certain hops or certain water chemistry or some other variable we're missing.
Dried Lutra 1 packet not rehydrated pitched and fermented at 85 . I'm drinking one now and it's really good and legitimately lager like. 80% Briess pilsner, 11% instant rice, 7% Quaker 5 minute grits and 2% acidulated malt for ph correction. 0.5 oz of Magnum at 60 minutes. In the past I brewed with Framgarden, Voss, Hornindal and Ebbegarden and I really disliked all of them. Lutra is completely different than those. I need to try Bootleg Biology's Oslo and Escarpment's Crispy as they are purported to be equally clean kveik strains. Condensation on the glass but it's clear and it cleared quickly with gelatin finings on the keg.My experience was with the dried lutra. Are you using the liquid culture? That might be they key also.
What fermentation temps have you tried with Diamond? It will likely be one of my next yeast purchases.I think the point is, a valid comparison between any 'crikey' strain and a commercial brewery yeast strain leads to the same conclusion; brewery yeast are much better. The 'hysteria' has more to do with marketing and beliefs than anything else. Hook, line and sinker, frankly.
If a brewer wants a genuine Lager with the convenience of sprinkling on dry yeast, after several months assessing it, I'm happy to recommend Diamond Lager yeast.
I've had great results in mid-60s.What fermentation temps have you tried with Diamond? It will likely be one of my next yeast purchases.
Under 15 psi, up to 20°C/68°F, for a nice lager. 15 psi @12°C for a very nice lager. If pressure fermentation is an option, 2-3 weeks grain to glass.What fermentation temps have you tried with Diamond? It will likely be one of my next yeast purchases.
That's your opinion and I would somewhat agree with you in that I do traditional lager brews and when I have one on tap side by side with a Lutra version they are better but not by a huge margin by any means. I find your obvious disdain for the yeast amusing and I suspect it would color your perception if someone handed you a good beer brewed with it. To each their own and while these psuedo lagers won't replace traditional lagers for me I like being able to produce a clean crisp delicious beer in a weeks time. Cheers guysI think the point is, a valid comparison between any 'crikey' strain and a commercial brewery yeast strain leads to the same conclusion; brewery yeast are much better. The 'hysteria' has more to do with marketing and beliefs than anything else. Hook, line and sinker, frankly.
If a brewer wants a genuine Lager with the convenience of sprinkling on dry yeast, after several months assessing it, I'm happy to recommend Diamond Lager yeast.
Absolutely, but also a fact you seem to agree with, nonetheless.That's your opinion
I have not played around much with Diamond yet but I’ve been doing the low to mid 60s thing with CellarScience German and it finishes quick and is very drinkable in a few weeks but seems the best around 5.I've had great results in mid-60s.
EDIT: My system is NOT under pressure. It will complete fermentation quickly, with minimal sulfur and diacetyl, but still it does improve and become more clean in taste after approximately 3-4 weeks.
Yeah I agreed completely right?Absolutely, but also a fact you seem to agree with, nonetheless.
Well, I'll certainly carry on using appropriate yeast strains for the styles of beer I brew. I always aim to produce the best beer I can.Yeah I agreed completely right?like I said your take is comical. I only chimed in on the thread because of all the YouTubers are lying about their results nobody can brew good beer with Lutra bs in this thread. I thought I would share my own personal success with it but you're obviously not interested so carry on with your propaganda campaign.
![]()
I would somewhat agree with you in that I do traditional lager brews and when I have one on tap side by side with a Lutra version they are better
None of the NHC winning homebrewed lagers have ever been fermented with a kveik strain. None of them.
Also, in fairness, all of them have been fermented cold. All of them.
Two houses ago I fermented without temp control in my basement, always used US-05 in 65 degree or so ambient temp, no temp control and no issues. I moved and didn’t have a basement anymore, ~74 ambient fermentation and all my beers stopped being good. I thought the US-05 threw a lot of unpleasant flavors. Mind you it was probably fermenting at 80 or so degrees.Seems like it's very rare to have a bad beer with US 05? I've never had one. I wonder how it works at say 75.
From my experience years ago with the 05 any ambient temp above 68f and it got fruity. If I stuck in the fridge with the temp probe tape to it and set it at 68 I was good. Keep in mind I haven’t used us05 in like 10 years or more.Seems like it's very rare to have a bad beer with US 05? I've never had one. I wonder how it works at say 75.