• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Jamil's Scottish Strong Ale

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It can be a bit complicated and I am by no means an expert. In fact, I probably know just enough to be dangerous. There are a couple of resident water experts on the forum who hang out in the Brew Science subforum who can answer specific questions and offer guidance.

To begin with, it requires knowing the mineral profile of your brewing water, which can usually be obtained from your municipal water provider or you can send a sample to a lab (e.g. Ward Labs) for analysis. Absent that, you could buy reverse osmosis (RO) or distilled water, which is essentially mineral free and then build it up from scratch using various salts/acid.

Once you have your water's profile, you can use one of the online spreadsheets/calculators (e.g. Bru'n Water, EZ Water, Northern Brewer's water calculator) to input your water profile, grain bill, mash thickness, and sparge volume to get a relatively close idea of where your pH will fall. The sweet spot is usually in the 5.2-5.4 range. If it falls outside of the range, you can add different salts to raise or lower the pH. Acid (usually lactic or phosphoric) and acidulated malt can be added to lower the pH. It's not uncommon to need a combination of salts and acid to get it where you want it. The style of brew will also play into the final water profile you should be aiming for, but pH control is the primary goal.

Finally, if you're tweaking your water you should have a reliable way to measure the pH so that you can verify what you ended up with is what you wanted. For that you can use test strips (not all that accurate, but better than nothing) or a pH meter.

For more info, take a look at the Brewing Water Chemistry Primer in the sticky in the Brew Science forum. It will get you pointed in the right direction.
 
Great!! Thanks! I will look into it. I'm probably going to go winging it style this time. I'll be more of a Walter White next beer
 
You're using US-05 right? If so, I'd mash at 156 since this strain can be expected to attenuate better than the Scottish ale strains. Also, this style will benefit from a 90 min boil if you can do it.


Two questions:
1.) Can you explain the purpose for the higher mash temp? Is it to increase efficiency?

2.) What is the purpose of the 90 minute boil? Do I just boil 30 minutes with no hops, then add hops according to schedule?

Thanks for all your help! I'm very excited to brew on Sunday!
 
The ideal yeast for this style would be Wyeast 1728 Scottish Ale or White Labs WL028 Edinburgh strain. Both of these are the same strain (McEwans) and would be expected to attenuate in the 70-75% range. The reason for the higher mash temp is to create a somewhat low fermentable wort so that you'll end up with a bigger bodied beer, which is how a Wee Heavy should be. In your original post you talked about pitching packets of US-05, so I assumed that's what you'll be using. US-05 (aka "Chico" strain) will typically attenuate in the 75-80% range. In order to compensate for that somewhat higher attenuation, you'll want to mash a bit higher than if you were using the Scottish ale yeasts to end up with the same FG when using a higher attenuating yeast. In the recipe, Jamil states to mash at 154 and that would be perfect for the Scottish ale yeasts. Both times I brewed this recipe I also used the Chico strain, but one of the liquid versions (WLP001) and in playing around with the recipe in BeerSmith, I found that Chico mashed at 156 would yield the same FG as W1728 or WLP028 mashed at 154, so that's where 156 comes from and why.

The 90 minute boil is to add some kettle caramelization to the wort to increase flavor and complexity. I don't know if you've ever had a Wee Heavy, but this style is very rich, sweet, and full bodied (as compared to most other styles) and the kettle caramelization you get from a little longer boil will help accentuate this. So, for the hop schedule, yes, you start the boil then add the hops when you have 60 minutes remaining.

I'm actually drinking one of my Wee Heavy's right now. All I can say is that it's an excellent brew.
 
Great! Thanks for the explanations! I've had Scottish styles before, and probably a Wee Heavy (I go to a lot of beer tastings, so a lot gets forgotten). I'm very excited to try this one. I will keep you all posted on how things are going.
 
Would this beer benefit from mashing at 150 degrees for 45 min and then raising the temperature to 156 for another 45 minutes? I've been listening to Jamil's podcast on high gravity beers and this was something John Palmer suggested.
 
I've not listened to the podcast, but I would expect a step mash like that to increase the fermentability of the wort, which is not something you would want with this style. I would see the value of this for a big Belgian or IIPA where you would want to increase fermentability so that it finishes dryer, and therefore, makes the beer less sweet and more quaffable, but not with a style like Wee Heavy that is supposed to be big bodied and, well, heavy. Again, I have not heard the podcast, so I'm just going off my own experience. I could be completely wrong.
 
Back
Top