• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Homebrew can save you lots of money

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

austinb

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 12, 2007
Messages
250
Reaction score
15
Location
Portland
I just bought a 50lb bag of great western malting two-row for $35 (the same base malt most western US craft breweries use). I was curious as to how much money I could save and I was pretty amazed at how cheap it could be to brew your own. At $35 for 50lbs of grain it comes out to $.70 a pound. I figured for an average beer such as a pale ale I would use about 10lbs base malt for a 5 gallon batch which comes to $7. Then I would use a couple pounds of a specialty malt at $1.50 a pound from the LHBS so thats another $3. I would use a high alpha hop like Magnum as the main bittering hop and then some of another hop like cascade for flavor toward the end of the boil. I figure an ounce and a half ought to do it unless you are making an IPA so that is about another $3. If you brew regularly enough you can reuse yeast by bottling and brewing on the same day and putting the wort on top of the yeast cake from the previous brew so I won't include a yeast cost (even though you will want to get new yeast every 6 or 7 batches or so), i'm also not factoring in water cost. So basically the total ingredients cost of this basic pale ale is $13. I usually get about 50 bottles of beer from a 5 gallon batch so thats 26 cents a beer or $1.56 a 6-pack. That is quite a bit cheaper than the average of $7-$10 a 6-pack at the local super market. Of course it wouldn't be any fun to just brew the same beer all the time and some recipes will require more specialty malts and ingredients but overall if you buy your base malt in bulk you will probably save at least 50% off the price of commercial beer if not more.
 
But you are not figuring in the cost of your labor. How much an hour are you worth? :rockin:
 
gestyr said:
But you are not figuring in the cost of your labor. How much an hour are you worth? :rockin:

Most of us do this a hobby. I don't consider it labor. Do you figure in cost of labor when you do your other hobbies?

I don't.
 
Most of us do this a hobby. I don't consider it labor. Do you figure in cost of labor when you do your other hobbies?

I don't.


I think it is a legit point seeing the point was saving money and the op put a lot of effort into his reasoning/figures. Say you worked a job instead for the time spent brewing, would the $$ made working outweigh the cost of the homemade beer? For me it would, cheaper to work and buy beer than to brew it. But I understand your point as well, it is a hobby and time enjoyed. ;)
 
It certainly saves a lot of money in the UK. I can get ingredients to clone Black Sheep for under £10, whereas buying the same amount of the real beer would set me back somewhere around £50-70. Add in a basic equipment pack for £25 and some stockpots for around £25 and I'm breaking even on my first batch. Even extract is far cheaper than buying good beer.

Silly government, making alcohol more expensive. Still, at least we never tried to ban it altogether :D
 
I think it is a legit point seeing the point was saving money and the op put a lot of effort into his reasoning/figures. Say you worked a job instead for the time spent brewing, would the $$ made working outweigh the cost of the homemade beer? For me it would, cheaper to work and buy beer than to brew it. But I understand your point as well, it is a hobby and time enjoyed. ;)

But say instead of brewing, you watched a football game or circle jerked with the guys next door.... Would you consider that a "cost"? If the "time is money" thought process goes to any time you are not working, then tons of things cost us money and we get much less in return.

I don't think we save a dime homebrewing... equipment, electricity, gas, fuel, water, chemicals, yeast, yada, yada, yada.

But I don't think it COSTS me anything for my "labor". I love doing this, and as such I do not equate this to "work" time.
 
I don't even have time to brew, I spend all my time counting all the money I've saved.

I average $40-$50 per ten gallon batch. I don't buy bulk though.

It's not about saving money to me. Though it could be cheap if you made it that way.

If you really want to save drink crappy beer by the suitcase.
 
You have left out fuel cost for your burners, and the cost of your sanitizer. I don't get grain that cheap where I live but I use a bit less than your example and my hops are about $1.00/oz. Altogether my beers average $.30-.35 per beer. Very reasonable. I'm aware of the money I spend on equipment but were it not for brewing I would have some other hobby soaking up funds so I don't count equipment costs. Fun stuff.
 
Here's how I figured it, for a 20 gallon run, $500 of great beer for under $60 and 20 hours do-not-disturb-me-time in 70 days. (125 bombers of beer valued at $4 per bottle.)

I broke even on equipment in the first year.

Not paying tax for alcohol? Priceless.

My beer tastes better to me than any I can buy.
 
Yeah I save money on the ingredients, but the 4 fermentors, bottling bucket, pot, kegs, taps, freezer, temperature controller, etc. I will most likely break even never. I like to build/upgrade things too much.
 
I haven't done the math to figure out if home brewing is cheaper than buying commercial beer but I feel it has many other non-monetary benefits:

  • It's a fun hobby
  • You can tweak recipes and customize beers to your liking
  • Home brew tastes better (it's fresher)
  • You learn a new skill (home brewing)
  • You can brew specialty or seasonal beers anytime you want instead of waiting for the stores to have them available
  • Pride in saying "I made this beer"
  • etc.

The above items make it "worth it" to me even if I'm not saving a ton of money by home brewing.
 
Buy used, sell used at zero loss. Equipment has no cost.

Man not this thread again. Isn't there 20 or so already?

@MAzdaMatt
Exactly. Most of the equipment I bought, although new, was bought with the $$ that I got for selling stuff of craigslist. The other stuff, Ie, used kegerator was an xmas gift to myself
 
I think my equipment to brew cost like $250, all grain, and can do 10gal batches. I broke even on that in no time. I buy in bulk as well. I brew on my days off work, and don't have anything else to do to get paid for, so I brew, which is primarily sitting around and drinking.
 
Here's how I figured it, for a 20 gallon run, $500 of great beer for under $60 and 20 hours do-not-disturb-me-time in 70 days. (125 bombers of beer valued at $4 per bottle.)

I broke even on equipment in the first year.

Not paying tax for alcohol? Priceless.

My beer tastes better to me than any I can buy.

Exactly. WTF are you people buying so that you're not breaking even? I own a kegging system, johnson digital controller, 10 g igloo with false bottom, chest freezer, stir plate, glass system with thermowell, and I am way ahead money wise. Even if my time was worth 10 an hour (good pay for "work" that is mostly hanging out with friends) I'd still be ahead. I can't think of any equipment I really need to make better beer. Also, most of this stuff will last me years, and I'm only 23.

I just dropped 100 bucks on the necessary equipment and ingredients to make a westy 12 clone. Guess what? As soon as it's done I got all my money back, and more. Brew one belgian strong ale or imperial something and you've got at least 100 bucks worth of retail beer. 5 gallons of Chimay would cost 250 bucks, but you can make it for 30.
 
The whole "how much is your time worth" argument in homebrewing is just dumb in my opinion. It's a hobby. If I'm not brewing I'd be watching tv or doing some other hobby. Hobby time has no cost.
 
I can understand people who add the equipment costs in (even though I don't), but I totally disagree with adding in labor costs.

First off, there's no way to quantify it. How much is your labor worth? It's not equivelent to your regular job's salary, because you are not doing your regular job when you brew. Unless you've been a professional brewer, no one knows their own worth as a brewer, so there's no value to the labor you are performing.

Secondly, unless your job allows you to brew on job time, you are using personal time to brew, so there is absolutely no connection to your homebrewing and making money. Unless you get paid 24 hours-a-day to run around in circles, brewing is not stopping anyone from making money that would neccesitate it being factored in as a labor cost.
 
But you are not figuring in the cost of your labor. How much an hour are you worth? :rockin:

Most people aren't able to, at will, work an additional hour for an additional hour of pay. The opportunity cost is the lost hour of leisure, not an hour of labor. For me brewing is leisure, so I lose nothing.
 
Lately, I've not been replying to 'cost of honebrewing' threads, in part because I don't want to be misconstrued or seen as denigrating brewers who take a different approach.

But here goes. For me, brewing is a very low cost craft. I haven't bought a piece of equipment in over two years. I have no latent engineering tendencies, so am not into the equipment at all. My brewing style tends towards the simple and 'handmade' approach, nothing is automated. I buy Ingredients in bulk, so even though I use organic ingredients, my ingredient costs average $15 per 5.5 gallon batch.

It is possible to enjoy this hobby and make great tasting beer at a very modest cost.
 
Unless you're dumping batches, or giving most of it away, when compared to an equivelent beer at retail cost, there is no question in my mind that we are saving money. I can make almost any beer style I see on the shelves for a much lower cost than what 5.5 gallons of said beer would run me on average at any store.

Considering I personally drink the majority of the beer I brew, it would cost me much more money to procure that beer from a retail outlet than to brew it myself as I do now.
 
Your time is worth a piece of ear wax, that is falling on a termite, that is choking on a splinter...

I feel Like I am now taking the Papper's approach. I am just finishing off my brewery needs and then I too will be all done. I have zero desire to automate any of the process and really enjoy this as a hobby. I also love the fact that I get to have total control over everything that ends or does not end up in my beers.
 
I feel Like I am now taking the Papper's approach. I am just finishing off my brewery needs and then I too will be all done. I have zero desire to automate any of the process and really enjoy this as a hobby. I also love the fact that I get to have total control over everything that ends or does not end up in my beers.

That's the beauty of this hobby to me. I am not just attracted to the end, but also the means. When I'm 60+ years old, I may seek automation, but until then, the path is in itself fulfillment.

:mug:
 
I try so hard not to post in these threads because they are so numerous but screw it, I'm bored.

I'm sorry, but people who post "but it's a hobby so you don't consider labor cost" are missing a huge point. This audience is already biased that homebrewing is fun. No ****. If it were a drag, we wouldn't be doing it. That proves the point right there. If you didn't find it fun, you wouldn't do it as a means of saving money.

If the statement was "homebrewing is a fun hobby and cheap beer is the icing on top" then you get no argument. We all agree.

However, the statement or rather the question is usually "can you really save money on beer by brewing it yourself?". In that case, it is pure economics question and all cost must be considered. To address it logically, you have put pull the homebrew obsession out of your head and address it as if it were a boring task.

For example, can you really save money by walking to work? Of course you can so why don't you? Of course, there are a billion other things you can save money on at the expense of time/labor but you skip 99% of them because they are not hobbies you are interested in.

At least work in a labor rate of HALF of your actual hourly wage to make it fair.

Apologies to the OP as I know you actually meant to write, "How buying in bulk reduces the cost of homebrewing" and you had no idea how well developed this debate is around here ;-)
 
I try so hard not to post in these threads because they are so numerous but screw it, I'm bored.

I'm sorry, but people who post "but it's a hobby so you don't consider labor cost" are missing a huge point. This audience is already biased that homebrewing is fun. No ****. If it were a drag, we wouldn't be doing it. That proves the point right there. If you didn't find it fun, you wouldn't do it as a means of saving money.

If the statement was "homebrewing is a fun hobby and cheap beer is the icing on top" then you get no argument. We all agree.

However, the statement or rather the question is usually "can you really save money on beer by brewing it yourself?". In that case, it is pure economics question and all cost must be considered. To address it logically, you have put pull the homebrew obsession out of your head and address it as if it were a boring task.

For example, can you really save money by walking to work? Of course you can so why don't you? Of course, there are a billion other things you can save money on at the expense of time/labor but you skip 99% of them because they are not hobbies you are interested in.

At least work in a labor rate of HALF of your actual hourly wage to make it fair.

'Twas wondering if you'd show up here. :D

My cost/pint last year was $1.95. That doesn't include propane, water, or time. It includes all ingredients and most equipment.

This year so far I'm at $3.03/pint, but I also am including more beer-related expenses; NHC ticket, AHA memberships, shipping to competitions, etc. But still not factoring in time, propane, water...
 
Back
Top