MississippiSlim
Well-Known Member
Its greener than cooking meth. 
The real problem is the third world countries that are rapidly becoming more industrialized and their populations are growing at a much faster rate than the developed countries. Try telling them they should cut back while they watch us continue to consume the bulk of the resources. Ain't gonna happen. Hopefully, the space aliens will arrive soon and show us how we can save our butts. OTOH, they may simply eat us if they are protein based critters.
It may be true that the third world countries are growing population faster than the rest of the world and that their industries are often less environmentally friendly, but it is the industrialized nations (US included) that are producing WAY more waste and greenhouse gases than the rest of the world.
We've set up a non-sustainable system and eventually we will pay for it. Fortunately, I probably won't be around when things start to get really nasty. Maybe none of us will.
As someone involved in the agricultural industry, I'll say the more CO2 in the air the better. CO2 makes plants grow better, which means more food for everyone. How can that be a bad thing? Especially since there's no objective proof it has an impact on the climate one way or the other.
You're kidding right?
Maybe a little, but nothing I said was false.
"...the more CO2 in the air the better." is certainly false in my opinion. There would be no need whatsoever for an agricultural industry if CO2 levels were high enough to kill anyone needing those agricultural products of hypercapnia.![]()
That was an opinion, and one meant to be taken slightly in jest. The facts, on the other hand, are not false.
I absolutely agree, but the rest of the world is gaining on us in that respect. We are not only producing way more waste and greenhouse gas, but we are consuming most of the worlds resources in the process and many of these are non-renewable such as petroleum and coal. We've set up a non-sustainable system and eventually we will pay for it. Fortunately, I probably won't be around when things start to get really nasty. Maybe none of us will.
the answer is obvious. grow your own hops and grain.....
Shouldn't this whole thread be in politics and debate as environmentalism is simply a crisis to empower politicians?
Serously, growing your own ingredients? Isn't their some soft of economy of scale to the polution from farm equipment and pesticides? I mean, once I douse my hops with enough malothinene (spelling?) to keep the bugs out, who am I helping?
Maybe trade the 4-wheel cage for a small displacement motorcycle and forgo air conditioning? While I may come accross as a politicizing ass, I happen to think that brewing a batch of beer makes about the diffrence of a sparrow farting in a hurricane when it comes to the environment.
I'll burn one for you. Agree 100%, but don't forget... the political animal doesn't even believe the garbage they throw at the masses. It is simply a campaign tool to retain their power.
Maybe someone from the other perspective can explain to me how my environmentalism is so backward and threatening. I just don't get it.![]()
]
Let's just discuss what we think we can do (personally) to reduce our own personal waste like the OP was talking about, huh?
Keep the name calling, wise cracks, insults and other OT stuff out of here. If you want to talk politics, go to the debate forum.
If you continue namecalling (and yes, words like "retarded" are namecalling), and personal attacks, you can find a new place to discuss brewing as well.