Co2 purity

Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum

Help Support Homebrew Talk - Beer, Wine, Mead, & Cider Brewing Discussion Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Finished beer to monitor O2 pickup and potential for future oxidation. But yes.

Purge verification process and thresholds I use (and way I measured the tank) are pretty standard in the industry. And like I said, mixed stories from Anton Paar. Especially since zeroing out the O2 (calibration) value is done with super high purity nitrogen gas and not liquid (though daily verifications done pushing distilled water with less high grade nitrogen). I've never done it myself but I know we have to use a higher purity than the standard nitro tanks we have. But seems odd it could be calibrated with gas phase but not measured with it. I'm not an engineer, so what do I know.

Perhaps what I should take away is that the numbers it spits out for gas values are useful and repeatable ones, but not face value ones. Similar to fermentation refractometer readings being useful for telling if fermentation is over but can't be taken at face value for gravity. That seems reasonable enough.

Where I'm confused now is the discrepancy between my bulk supply and bottle supply then. To my knowledge they are same grade and definitely same supplier. Does that discrepancy both in measured value and behavior with dissolved oxygen levels in the beer tell me that there is indeed a purity difference? Or is something else going on? Process stays the same, just a little smaller scale.
 
That's pretty much what they're trying to hammer into us plebs. The math makes it hard to argue with.
I just wish I had some of those 6.5 gallon kegs for that, because I hate ending up with less than a full five gallons x2 kegs after all the effort to brew a batch.
I can't drink empty space in a keg :D

Cheers!
 
I love the brewing science section. I almost always learn something. Usually that my observations are valid but my shop-floor-science explanation for them is sh!te.
 
I just like fermentation keg purge to save on how often i have to refill the 20# CO2 tank

That's the pecuniary science of thrift.
 
Speaking of CO2.. I wonder if it will become hard to come by in the next few months due to vaccine shipping? If so, great time to learn about spunding.
 
In 2020 there has already been an ongoing CO2 supply chain issue due to C19 depressing the ethanol markets and the production thereof.
I presume the production of dry ice uses CO2 as feedstock, and clearly there are priorities in life...

Cheers?
 
But seems odd it could be calibrated with gas phase but not measured with it. I'm not an engineer, so what do I know.
That tells us that the sensor's zero point is the same but the gradient is different for dissolved O2 and free O2. Same thing happens with polarimetric DO sensors. If you try to measure O2 in the headspace with them you get very low readings but the reality is very different.
 
In 2020 there has already been an ongoing CO2 supply chain issue due to C19 depressing the ethanol markets and the production thereof.
I presume the production of dry ice uses CO2 as feedstock, and clearly there are priorities in life...

Cheers?
Hopefully they can use much more "dirty" (and cheap) CO2 sources for dry ice production.
 
completley off topic but i just did what i assume is very poorly done molar math on 50ppm.....that would be like 2.5 grams of oxygen in a keg, which would probably be enough to mess up hops in a keg in a while. i just loosly did it and with my burst carbing by weight know that would be .06 mols of o2 compared to the co2, and then i burst with ~1.2oz...molar weight of o2 would be around 28 co2 44?

(my idea for a new homebrew device, an inline filter for scrubing co2! i'll make a killing selling replacement filter packs! ;))
20 PSI of CO2 gas, in a 5 gallon ball lock, weighs about 50 grams (1.76 ounces).
50 grams of CO2 is about 1.14 mol for the head space of an empty keg
50 ppm O2 would therefore be .000057 mol or .0018 grams or 6.35e-5 oz, not 2.5 grams!

If you then figure that you carbonate to about 2.5 vol of dissolved gas, your total O2 exposure would be 0.0045 grams O2 in the beer + an additional .0018 from the makeup head space or 0.0063 grams worst case (the last dregs).
 
Last edited:
PS - CO2 purity levels by grade:

GradePurity
Research99.999
Super-critical Fluid99.998
Laser99.95
Anaerobic99.95
Beverage99.9
Food99.9
Bone Dry99.8
Medical99.5
Industrial99.5
 
But as I've said before, I have ROUTINELY watched levels in transferred beer (which is the on-label usage) drop below normal transfer pickup levels with application of CO2 via carb stone (gas stripping) using bulk supply (which we've measured to 5-8ppb) and rise using bottled CO2. If the supply were in the ppm range instead of ppb, I'd expect it to rise (or rise further), not fall. It gives me some confidence that even if those gas readings aren't 100% accurate they're close to it.
It just occurred to me that when measuring dissolved oxygen (or any other gas) the measurement is given in ppm or ppb mass/mass and not vol/vol. This would also be a reason why the instrument gives unrealistic readings when measuring a gas mixture that has a density much lower than that of water or finished beer. Even if the whole residual O2 (let's say it's really 50 ppm vol/vol) where to go into solution you would not reach 50 ppm mass/mass but rather something in the 10-100 ppb range. In other words the sensor probably gives valid readings of the O2 concentration but the instrument's logic is translating it into a measurement under a different assumption, i.e. an O2/water mixure instead of an O2/CO2 mixture.
 
Hopefully they can use much more "dirty" (and cheap) CO2 sources for dry ice production.
Good point. And assuming the manufacturers of dry ice are rightly focused on not only on production but also economy, why should they? The level of oxygen 'contamination' in industrial CO2 isn't a factor in dry ice production, so why would they pay 10x as much for their raw material?

Brooo Brother
 
Assuming that the instrument's sensor is correctly reading the concentration of O2 and then translating it in mass/mass dimensionless (assuming a density of 1000 kg/m^3) units your reading of 40ppb in the gas should then actually correspond to 28ppm which is totally believable for food-grade CO2 bought from a reputable supplier.
 
Back
Top