Bucket v.s. conical v.s. unitank

[OakIslandBrewery]

yep.
though i still make 10 gallon batches.
i keep those fermenters in a fridge in the basement on a stand.
brew outside then use a long hose to run the wort down to the fermenters.
at keg time hook hose up to spigot on fermenter and fill.
now when there is just a few gallons left i do need to take out the fermenter to get more elevation however after thinking about it i've ordered some fittings and a keg charger and plan to use that to push the remaining beer out of the fermenter.
i think. lol.
not sure it will actually work.

either way the most i'm lugging is a 5 gallon brew bucket down the stairs.
once i get basement brewing sorted out i won't even be doing that.

I've thought about your idea of "piping" from brewing in the connected garage to the basement fermenter. Right now I brew strictly in the basement and I do like that convenience but the garage would offer more room. Not sure I want to expand right now when everything fits OK in my small basement brew space (10 gallon batches also). Good to dream of an expanded area though.

 

[NitrogenWidget]

I've thought about your idea of "piping" from brewing in the connected garage to the basement fermenter. Right now I brew strictly in the basement and I do like that convenience but the garage would offer more room. Not sure I want to expand right now when everything fits OK in my small basement brew space (10 gallon batches also). Good to dream of an expanded area though.

I bought a 100kbtu propane cooker when i upgraded to a 20 gallon pot.
so much easier with the hose plus it aerates great.

 

[UdonPete]

It's very encouraging reading about everyone that's keeping the hobby alive. It's come to the point that homebrewers are churning out beer better than a lot of the craft brewers and certainly the mega breweries. As Murph says "brew on"!

Hobby, to me it’s a necessity – what would life be without our brew days and the subsequent enjoyment drinking the results

 

[axborn]

I do triple/60l/15gallon batches and wanted to do pressurized fermentation. Didn't care about yeast harvesting and wanted the simplest cleanest approach. I love stainless steel but not as much as the ability to see what's going on inside the fermentation vessel.
So the only logical approach was to get Fermzilla All-rounder 60l. Cheap AF - invested rest of the money into temperature control, sparge water heater, iTap and other things which actually make my life easier and beer better
Just few days ago bottled almost 1bbl as I've got a second all-rounder now... things are getting out of hand

 

[OakIslandBrewery]

I bought a 100kbtu propane cooker when i upgraded to a 20 gallon pot.
so much easier with the hose plus it aerates great.

How far is your transfer from the brew kettle to the fermenter?

 

[OakIslandBrewery]

I do triple/60l/15gallon batches and wanted to do pressurized fermentation. Didn't care about yeast harvesting and wanted the simplest cleanest approach. I love stainless steel but not as much as the ability to see what's going on inside the fermentation vessel.
So the only logical approach was to get Fermzilla All-rounder 60l. Cheap AF - invested rest of the money into temperature control, sparge water heater, iTap and other things which actually make my life easier and beer better
Just few days ago bottled almost 1bbl as I've got a second all-rounder now... things are getting out of hand

Welcome to the group!

The Fermizilla looks very interesting and certainly very cost effective. When I bought my CF10 I got the clear TC cap so I could look inside. Not like you are able to see but enough to see if the yeast is starting to work.

This thread started out as buckets versus conical/unitank but I like reading everyone's approach to their brewing. Buckets work fine, BIAB, conicals, we all have different reason why we brew the way we do. As you stated, whatever works to make it easier and still be fun.

Keep brewing!

 

[Broothru]

Welcome to the group!

The Fermizilla looks very interesting and certainly very cost effective. When I bought my CF10 I got the clear TC cap so I could look inside. Not like you are able to see but enough to see if the yeast is starting to work.

This thread started out as buckets versus conical/unitank but I like reading everyone's approach to their brewing. Buckets work fine, BIAB, conicals, we all have different reason why we brew the way we do. As you stated, whatever works to make it easier and still be fun.

Keep brewing!

^^^Truth^^^

 

[NitrogenWidget]

How far is your transfer from the brew kettle to the fermenter?

I'm using 20 ft of hose.
It runs down the basement railing from the patio to the fridge at the bottom of the stairs into my fermenter.

 

[MaxOut]

If you're considering the jump to a conical and feel you are making the best possible beer in buckets the move would yield small gains comparing ROI against the quality of your beer. I think it also depends on your brewing style. If you are brewing basic lagers and ales, bottling and do not harvest yeast or dry hop the advantage of a conical is minimal. For me the choice was a Uni-Tank. I brew a lot of hoppy beers and wanted to take my brewing skills to the next level. I wanted to learn how big breweries brew and learn their techniques. I also exclusively keg my beer as I do not like the time-consuming bottling process. With the Uni-Tank I can also do pressurized fermentation that allows me to carbonate naturally in the fermenter. Along with using CO2 to move the beer from the fermenter to the kegs in a closed loop to prevent oxidation. Most people say temperature control is a drawback to having a conical fermenter but if you are not all ready controlling the fermentation temperature on your buckets then you are not making your best beers or making them consistently. My Uni-Tanks live in a BCS controlled refrigerator with full heating and cooling control. I just figured that into the cost when I decided to purchase the Uni-Tanks. I still use buckets for certain beers and small batches as my Uni-Tanks are 1 BBL and I don't brew most of my sipping beers that large.

At the end of the day IMO if you are brewing as a hobby and feel like you have reached the limits in your buckets, want to learn more and how to ferment in conical then it doesn't have to make sense money wise. Most hobbies have nothing to do with ROI it's more about enjoyment.

 

[SaisonMan]

New $249 conical from Northern Brewer:

https://www.northernbrewer.com/products/reactor-stainless-steel-conical-fermenter

 

[WesBrew]

You probably wont make better beer if you're making good beer now. I got a CF10 a few months ago. It wasn't something i needed to make good beer. was something i wanted. Looked beautiful, will last forever. Buy once, cry once, as they say. Still i wasnt sure i made the right choice until i really got into using it.
Add wheels its mobile, add coil and glycol, controlled ferment. manifold, you can spund/add gas/pressure transfers...etc. Love the cone and bottom dump to dump trub, harvest yeast. and as noted above, leave the yeast in there and dump new brew right on top. i'm finishing my third beer in a row on the same yeast. The sampling port gets used often (doubles as a sightglass for me ) and you can carbonate in the vessel. Sanitizing, a couple extra minutes but still easy. Make a small bucket of sanitzer dump the parts in and put back on. 5 minutes. Dump bucket of sanitizer in the fermenter and wipe down and drain. save for later.
I really love the clean-in-place ability. i use a hose and spray nozzle connected to the sink, inside the house. I spray it down and drain into a bucket, roll it next to the fridge. I love the giant lid where you can really get in to clean. On paper it seems like more work but its only more surface area. Its actually easier to clean, its so open you can get both arms in at once. really enjoying it. Downside, did not enjoy the expense of all the extra parts.
*i'll also add that with the gas post & robust dump port at the bottom, i no longer use a filter or bag for hops in the boil. all of it rolls around in the kettle for good flavor and i transfer it all to the fermenter. do a t dump at 24hrs.

 

[OakIslandBrewery]

All great points from Wesbrew. I own the same fermenter, bought it several years ago and still love it every time I use it. It was well worth the purchase, and I have no regrets making the plunge. I brew ales so I don't have any of the temp controls but at any time I could add them.

 

[jerrylotto]

I have an SS Brewbucket but I still prefer my 7g FastFerment plastic conical when I don't need to ferment under pressure. The translucent body lets you see what is going on. It is a little heavy when full but I can transport it up and down a set of stairs on my own. The 2g overhead is enough to contain most aggressive krausen and it is simple enough for me to clean and sanitize. When I need to really kill off aggressive beasties like Brett - I use a plastic bag and hit it with ozone overnight.

 

[Smudgey]

Another vote for a fermzilla. It was by far the best Bang-for-buck beer improvement for me. A plastic conical unitank is a cheap option for trying pressure fermenting /spunding / yeast collection / trub dumps / O2 exclusion and decent options for temp control, closed transfers, oxidation free dry hopping etc. All improvements over (the way I was) fermenting in a bucket.
I have a more expensive SS fermenter but except for mead, I just use an older /less evolved version of this fermzilla now:
https://www.kegland.com.au/27l-fermzilla-tri-conical-pressure-brewing-kit.htmlWish I had this one! The tri-clamps are a massive upgrade and give me fermenter envy.

 

[madscientist451]

I think its alot like cars. One guy drives a BMW, another guy drives a Chevy. In the end they are both vehicles that function similarly and over 99% of the time both vehicles will get you where you want to go. One is more of a status symbol and may have a couple nice features the other does not. It’s all relative to the person and their budget.

A BMW gets you where you want to go when its new and under warranty. After that, its an endless money pit unless you do all your own work, and time is money, so its still an endless money pit. GM products can be a money pit also, depends what you get, but not near as bad as the Euro cars like BMW, Mercedes and Audi.
But back to the OP's subject: another option is to ferment in a corny keg. Add a spunding valve and you're fermenting in SS for under $75, and can do closed transfers.

 

[franknbeans]

36 here and love reading the stories by the more knowledgeable generations! I started this two years ago, and am hooked on the hobby. Thank you all for the wisdom!!

 

[OakIslandBrewery]

It's a great hobby and very rewarding in many ways. As you see on this site lots of folks share their knowledge, recipes and when we can, our beers too. Belonging to a local home brew club if you can, is also a great way to expand your knowledge and share ideas. Now that the plague is almost over try going to some brew fests. Our local club can be seen at several of these events and opens up meeting others in the brewing community. Enjoy the hobby as much as you can!

 

[Broothru]

A BMW gets you where you want to go when its new and under warranty. After that, its an endless money pit unless you do all your own work, and time is money, so its still an endless money pit. GM products can be a money pit also, depends what you get, but not near as bad as the Euro cars like BMW, Mercedes and Audi.
But back to the OP's subject: another option is to ferment in a corny keg. Add a spunding valve and you're fermenting in SS for under $75, and can do closed transfers.

I've continuously owned at least one Volvo (sometimes two) since 1972 simultaneously along with numerous German, Japanese and American iron. The Volvos have always been the most dependable and least worrisome regarding upkeep and maintenance. Not all Euro cars are created equal, and IMHO Volvos have no equal.

'Course, SWMBO'd is of Scandinavian descent, and she made me say this. 'Cause, you know, Mother's Day...

 

[madscientist451]

I've continuously owned at least one Volvo (sometimes two) since 1972 simultaneously along with numerous German, Japanese and American iron. The Volvos have always been the most dependable and least worrisome regarding upkeep and maintenance. Not all Euro cars are created equal, and IMHO Volvos have no equal.

'Course, SWMBO'd is of Scandinavian descent, and she made me say this. 'Cause, you know, Mother's Day...

Apologizing in advance for going off topic, but what would be a good "recent" (since say 2012?) Volvo to get with reliability being the most important ? I had a 70's 164 and still have a 2007 DL wagon, so I'm a little bit familiar with Volvo, but I've heard the more recent models suffer from blown head gaskets, transmission and electrical issues that make them expensive to keep on the road and are generally a TPITA.

 

[Broothru]

Apologizing in advance for going off topic, but what would be a good "recent" (since say 2012?) Volvo to get with reliability being the most important ? I had a 70's 164 and still have a 2007 DL wagon, so I'm a little bit familiar with Volvo, but I've heard the more recent models suffer from blown head gaskets, transmission and electrical issues that make them expensive to keep on the road and are generally a TPITA.

We bought an S60 in 2013 about a year before retiring. Close to 70,000 miles on it now, 90% of which is mostly less than 50 mile jaunts. Since I seldom do my own upkeep and maintenance anymore, it gets regular service visits to the dealership. Tires, new timing belt, minor glitches, routine oil changes. Knock wood, absolutely nothing out of normal wear & tear. Had a '75 DL wagon that went close to 400,000 miles over 17 years with nothing major. Picked it up the day we brought our son home from the hospital, and it lasted 16 years until he started driving it.

 

[WesBrew]

Back on point; conicals look awesome!

 

[Yesfan]

I agree with pretty much all the posts above, so won't repeat what's already been said.

For me, the biggest reasons for getting my CF-10 was.......

fermenting double batches in a single vessel
harvesting yeast/dumping trub
I like stainless.

I've scaled back a lot of my stuff since some of you all were talking about age (I'm 51). Like what's been said, priorities change as you get older. Now I'm down to the CF-10, Spike+, and a Fermzilla All Rounder 30L. Sold the 8 tap keezer to "downgrade" to a 4 tap Komos kegerator. No more lifting kegs over the top of a chest freezer.

If you can afford the conical, then get it. Truth be told, I think I would have been as happy with a couple of the larger All Rounders for the double batches, but I still don't regret getting the CF-10. You only live once. I've been looking at more to stream line my process to make it easier for me to brew at 70 when (if?) I get there vs when I started in my early 40s. Adapt and overcome. Brew on.

 

[OakIslandBrewery]

I agree with pretty much all the posts above, so won't repeat what's already been said.

For me, the biggest reasons for getting my CF-10 was.......

fermenting double batches in a single vessel
harvesting yeast/dumping trub
I like stainless.

I've scaled back a lot of my stuff since some of you all were talking about age (I'm 51). Like what's been said, priorities change as you get older. Now I'm down to the CF-10, Spike+, and a Fermzilla All Rounder 30L. Sold the 8 tap keezer to "downgrade" to a 4 tap Komos kegerator. No more lifting kegs over the top of a chest freezer.

If you can afford the conical, then get it. Truth be told, I think I would have been as happy with a couple of the larger All Rounders for the double batches, but I still don't regret getting the CF-10. You only live once. I've been looking at more to stream line my process to make it easier for me to brew at 70 when (if?) I get there vs when I started in my early 40s. Adapt and overcome. Brew on.

Yup, great to plan for the future, and a future that includes brewing!

 

[Bobby_M]

The primary reason that I don't currently ferment in conicals is that I'm regularly brewing 6 gallon batches right now and more than half the time I choose to split that into two 3-gallon ferments to compare variables like yeast strain, temperature profiles, dry hop combos etc. I learn, take notes, share my findings and the beer with whoever listens and brew again. The rare cases where I bulk ferment 6 gallons for party beer or Hombrewcon doesn't really justify having the conical on hand. If I was more of a 10 gallon batcher, I'd be all over the CF15s.

 

[WesBrew]

I don’t know if you could get 6g out of a CF5 but you could surely get 6g in. The CF5 =7 gallons total & CF10=14 gallons. Easier to push the upper limit on the CF10

 

[Broothru]

I don’t know if you could get 6g out of a CF5 but you could surely get 6g in. The CF5 =7 gallons total & CF10=14 gallons. Easier to push the upper limit on the CF10

Yesterday I did a pressure transfer (2 psi, max, from a 7 gallon SS Brew Bucket with domed lid) of a Key Lime cider into a 5 gallon keg. Pre-fermentation volume was 24L/6.3 gallons. The cider was still transferring clear when the keg topped out, so I continued transferring into a spare 1.6 gallon Torpedo keg. Unclear how much went into the mini keg, but there appeared to be maybe 2~3L settled solids in the Brew Bucket.

Granted, there's not much debris from a cider or wine fermentation compared to the hops and 'break' material you get from beer, let alone the krausen. But you could certainly get 5.5+ gallons out of a 7 gallon capacity fermenter.

 

[WesBrew]

Sounds about right. It might be a little easier to do smaller batches on the smaller vessel. I did recently do a 1.5 gallon batch in the cf10. I could not use the sample port or cold crash it but it was a success

 

[Yesfan]

Sounds about right. It might be a little easier to do smaller batches on the smaller vessel. I did recently do a 1.5 gallon batch in the cf10. I could not use the sample port or cold crash it but it was a success

1.5 gallons in a 10 gallon conical?? Talk about tons of head space. Impressive. How far up the conical did that batch go?

 

[WesBrew]

Looks like just shy of the sample port.

 

[Yesfan]

Looks like just shy of the sample port.

That's a CF-10? Looks almost like a CF-5 or Flex. That volume's higher than I was expecting.

Pretty awesome! Now Spike will have to change the description on what batches are compatible. LOL!