What's its origin?Bry-97 is unique that’s for sure. Especially when you look at the Suregork yeast DNA study. The fact that it produces a relatively clean beer considering it’s origin is kinda nuts.
What's its origin?Bry-97 is unique that’s for sure. Especially when you look at the Suregork yeast DNA study. The fact that it produces a relatively clean beer considering it’s origin is kinda nuts.
What's its origin?
It's burping every nine seconds now. Good yeast it may be I probably won't use it again.It's just a laggy yeast. Dried yeast should last for several years in good storage, so I doubt that's a big player here. This one is strain specific. If lag time worries you, then use a different yeast other than BRY-97. But it's a very good yeast.
It was going this morning at 7, so it probably took around 38-40 hours.You find the occasional person on the internet having no trouble with lag time with this yeast, but the majority experiences about 48h lag.
I suspect that there is an inconsistency with the cell count of this yeast either due to production or shipping. I cannot explain this otherwise.
This zinc thing would be really interesting to be further investigated.
Same for me, around 40 and last night it was going quite vigorously. Yet this morning it's slowed way down.I think it took also about 40 hours when I used it and then it went absolutely bananas.
It's like "what is this s hit you are trying to feed me here? No bah, this wort tastes funny, not gonna eat this."Same for me, around 40 and last night it was going quite vigorously. Yet this morning it's slowed way down.
Anyone ever measured the pH drop during said lag time? Even if you’re not seeing activity it doesn’t mean the yeast isn’t working. I wonder if it takes this yeast a long time to drop the pH and if lowering the pH into the FV would decrease lag?
Exactly what I was thinking! Someone suggest this to Brulosophy so they can be useful again lol.
Exactly what I was thinking! Someone suggest this to Brulosophy so they can be useful again lol.
The data becomes a lot more useful if you lower your expectations by saying there might be differences beginning at p=0.15 or 0.20, rather than the arbitrary and overly restrictive (and yes all these values are arbitrary) value of 0.05.
I’m not super concerned with the statistics (and all the associated arguments here), more so the lack of creativity the site has had over the last year plus. Maybe my expectations are too high, but really seems like they’re coasting to the end.