Silver_Is_Money
Larry Sayre, Developer of 'Mash Made Easy'
A.J., I believe have resolved my buffer issue. When my (admittedly inferior to Solver) static buffer value is set at 50 (where I get the best matches to your values) and when I set up 'MME' to match your scenario for the mashing of both 10 lbs. and 30 lbs. of DI_pH 5.6227 base malt into 11 gallons of 95.4545 ppm alkalinity water, with zero ppm's of Ca++ or Mg++ present, I now get the following as output:
1) For 10 lbs. the mash pH for 'MME' is now 5.9739 (whereas formerly it was something like 6.17, and whereas you reported getting 5.96 via Solver)
2) For 30 lbs. the mash pH for 'MME' is now 5.7398 (whereas formerly it was something like 5.81, and whereas you reported getting 5.7432 via solver)
RPIScotty, my buffer no longer seems to be causing any downstream problems with regard to alkalinity matching well with baking soda, such that the two are properly interchangeable (mEq for mEq). The only difference of significance which I see now is attributable to my implementation of A.J.'s formula to compensate for the weak dissociation of baking soda within the range of mash pH's. No interference with lactic acid addition quantities matching up with negative alkalinity either.
1) For 10 lbs. the mash pH for 'MME' is now 5.9739 (whereas formerly it was something like 6.17, and whereas you reported getting 5.96 via Solver)
2) For 30 lbs. the mash pH for 'MME' is now 5.7398 (whereas formerly it was something like 5.81, and whereas you reported getting 5.7432 via solver)
RPIScotty, my buffer no longer seems to be causing any downstream problems with regard to alkalinity matching well with baking soda, such that the two are properly interchangeable (mEq for mEq). The only difference of significance which I see now is attributable to my implementation of A.J.'s formula to compensate for the weak dissociation of baking soda within the range of mash pH's. No interference with lactic acid addition quantities matching up with negative alkalinity either.