• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

AG never finish attenuating

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I’ve been debating sending off to ward, but also considering getting a RO system in the brewery.
 
my thought has been that the pH is off a bit for the mash. I’m going to recalibrate my pH meter.

Your pH meter should be calibrated before every use.

What mash pH were you getting? When were you measuring it, and at what temperature?
 
That’s one of my biggest failures. I haven’t measured mash pH. I added 5.2 stabilizer but I don’t know how effective it is.
 
That’s one of my biggest failures. I haven’t measured mash pH. I added 5.2 stabilizer but I don’t know how effective it is.

I would skip the stabilizer word on the street is it is not effective.
 
That’s one of my biggest failures. I haven’t measured mash pH. I added 5.2 stabilizer but I don’t know how effective it is.

You didn't mention above that you added 5.2 stabilizer. Is there anything else that you added?

I don't think it would affect attenuation, but I don't think that it helps unless by luck you happen to have the same specific water makeup and goals that it was designed for.
 
Nothing else added that I can think of, I think the logical next step is to just start from RO water and build the water profile from there and see if it’s really the water or something else.
 
Yeast nutrient is unnecessary for beer, it can really harm the flavour though so I'd skip it.

I bet it's the temperature, false readings from the thermometer.
Why do you say yeast nutrient can harm the flavor of the beer? I’ve always used the wyeast nutrient and never noticed any problems, but now you have me curious.
 
Why do you say yeast nutrient can harm the flavor of the beer? I’ve always used the wyeast nutrient and never noticed any problems, but now you have me curious.
Because it is extra stuff that has a taste that goes into the beer. I know of cases, where mysterious off-flavours were hunted and hunted and not found... until they ditched the yeast nutrient.

Malt is basically really rich in nutrients, and although beer yeasts are a bit of spoiled character, compared to not minding wine yeasts, they still have everything they need within the wort already present. A healthy pitch rate and fitting temperatures is everything that is needed.

One could argue that kveiks are a little exception, as they have eveolved within higher gravity wort, but from my own experiments, I must say that at least lutra performs very well in low gravity worts (1.03) without any extra nutrients. I had the same result with voss in "normal" gravity wort (around 1.05).

So the takeaway is: Do not use stuff in your beer that is unnecessary because it will somehow affect the flavour. if it is in there, it will be also in the flavour, maybe underneath the taste threshhold if you are lucky, but if unnecessary from the beginning, why take the risk?
 
From what you told us I don't see much that sticks out as a potential issue except for using pH 5.2, your thermometer, and your water.

Stop using pH 5.2 (it's snakeoil), and verify your thermometer is accurate by "calibrating it" in melting ice (32F) and boiling water (212F at sea level, adjust for your elevation)!
What thermometer is that?

It’s odd, since moving a few years ago is when the issues started.
And moving came with a different water source... That really seems to point to the issue.

Do your next batch with RO water and let us know.
 
Because it is extra stuff that has a taste that goes into the beer. I know of cases, where mysterious off-flavours were hunted and hunted and not found... until they ditched the yeast nutrient.

Malt is basically really rich in nutrients, and although beer yeasts are a bit of spoiled character, compared to not minding wine yeasts, they still have everything they need within the wort already present. A healthy pitch rate and fitting temperatures is everything that is needed.

One could argue that kveiks are a little exception, as they have eveolved within higher gravity wort, but from my own experiments, I must say that at least lutra performs very well in low gravity worts (1.03) without any extra nutrients. I had the same result with voss in "normal" gravity wort (around 1.05).

So the takeaway is: Do not use stuff in your beer that is unnecessary because it will somehow affect the flavour. if it is in there, it will be also in the flavour, maybe underneath the taste threshhold if you are lucky, but if unnecessary from the beginning, why take the risk?
I don’t know man. I understand your overall point but I’ve used the wyeast beer nutrient for years and never noticed anything negative from it. Perhaps I’ll try a batch or two without it but I’d be shocked if I noticed a difference. I dilute a tiny amount of it in a tiny amount of water, and then add it with about 10 minutes left in the boil. I really can’t see how it would contribute to off flavors in the final beer, but I guess I can’t really say for sure.
 
Sounds to me like you either don't aerate your wort or don't aerate enough. Yeast really needs O2 in about 8 - 11 ppm which takes a lot of shaking.
 
OP stated they were using US-05. Fermentis, in their Tips & Tricks brochure (page 22, link to download) mentions that there is no need for aeration when following their processes (initial pitch, either dry or re-hydrated).

That being said, if one is re-pitching US-05, it would seem reasonable to apply 'best practices' for liquid yeast strains.
 
Yeast really needs O2 in about 8 - 11 ppm which takes a lot of shaking.
The above is one of those brewing myths that just won't die. Brewers large and small made beer for centuries without adding oxygen. You don't need to shake your beer or add oxygen. Put a funnel in your carboy and dump your wort in. A healthy, active and proper amount of yeast will consume fermentable sugar.
 
How did the FG get determined? A SG reading after a prescribed time period. Or two identical SG's three days apart? Or some other?

Possible the the fermentation was still going on and just never finished.
 
Back
Top