my thought has been that the pH is off a bit for the mash. I’m going to recalibrate my pH meter.
That’s one of my biggest failures. I haven’t measured mash pH. I added 5.2 stabilizer but I don’t know how effective it is.
That’s one of my biggest failures. I haven’t measured mash pH. I added 5.2 stabilizer but I don’t know how effective it is.
Why do you say yeast nutrient can harm the flavor of the beer? I’ve always used the wyeast nutrient and never noticed any problems, but now you have me curious.Yeast nutrient is unnecessary for beer, it can really harm the flavour though so I'd skip it.
I bet it's the temperature, false readings from the thermometer.
Because it is extra stuff that has a taste that goes into the beer. I know of cases, where mysterious off-flavours were hunted and hunted and not found... until they ditched the yeast nutrient.Why do you say yeast nutrient can harm the flavor of the beer? I’ve always used the wyeast nutrient and never noticed any problems, but now you have me curious.
And moving came with a different water source... That really seems to point to the issue.It’s odd, since moving a few years ago is when the issues started.
I don’t know man. I understand your overall point but I’ve used the wyeast beer nutrient for years and never noticed anything negative from it. Perhaps I’ll try a batch or two without it but I’d be shocked if I noticed a difference. I dilute a tiny amount of it in a tiny amount of water, and then add it with about 10 minutes left in the boil. I really can’t see how it would contribute to off flavors in the final beer, but I guess I can’t really say for sure.Because it is extra stuff that has a taste that goes into the beer. I know of cases, where mysterious off-flavours were hunted and hunted and not found... until they ditched the yeast nutrient.
Malt is basically really rich in nutrients, and although beer yeasts are a bit of spoiled character, compared to not minding wine yeasts, they still have everything they need within the wort already present. A healthy pitch rate and fitting temperatures is everything that is needed.
One could argue that kveiks are a little exception, as they have eveolved within higher gravity wort, but from my own experiments, I must say that at least lutra performs very well in low gravity worts (1.03) without any extra nutrients. I had the same result with voss in "normal" gravity wort (around 1.05).
So the takeaway is: Do not use stuff in your beer that is unnecessary because it will somehow affect the flavour. if it is in there, it will be also in the flavour, maybe underneath the taste threshhold if you are lucky, but if unnecessary from the beginning, why take the risk?
The above is one of those brewing myths that just won't die. Brewers large and small made beer for centuries without adding oxygen. You don't need to shake your beer or add oxygen. Put a funnel in your carboy and dump your wort in. A healthy, active and proper amount of yeast will consume fermentable sugar.Yeast really needs O2 in about 8 - 11 ppm which takes a lot of shaking.