All mineral amounts should be halved i.e. where the baseline calls for a tsp. use a half. For places where doubling the baseline is recommended double the new base line (1/2 * 2 = 1 tsp).
Yes, for the whole primer. I've been saying for quite a while that it should be redone as tastes seem to be for the less minerally now and Yooper has asked me to redo it. It will be the first of my projects when I get up north in a couple of weeks.
Not appreciably and, therefore, no.
appreciableHow is it not applicable?
We add gypsum and sodium chloride to the water and it brings the pH down. If you put less of the salts the pH will be higher.
appreciable
Not appreciably.
Do some calcs using one of the spreadsheets. How much calcium does it take to lower the pH of the mash by 0.05 pH according to the spreadsheet? Now double that number. Kohlbach's finding was for knockout wort and the effect, therefore, is less for the mash. As a fascinating illustration of not being able to see the forest for the trees I translated Kohlbach's paper and failed to notice that point!
Kohlbach found that each mEq Ca++ released 1/3.5 mEq of protons to knockout. I guess that in the mash it's probably half that. I you wan't to take this into account in your calculation then go ahead and do so but it is not consistent with the concept of the primer.
To be more concrete with an example I happen to have a beer with mostly base malt and some dark caramel in my spreadsheet at the moment. With 1 tsp CaCl2 in 5 gal the sauermalz requirement for mash pH 5.4 was 2.8%. With half that miich (1/2 tsp per 5 gal) it goes up to 3.1%. At the level of accuracy of the Primer that is 3% in either case.
It is a good question but the answer is that it doesn't matter enough to be worrying about at the Primer level.
Is a Centennial Blonde considered a softwater beer?
Trying to determine how to apply the primer to Biermuncher's Centennial Blonde recipe I'm brewing tomorrow using RO water.
It's a light non-hoppy beer. Using calcium chloride and no gypsum would be great.
I've been having a hard time understanding water additives. I use brewersfriend as my software, this will be for a cream ale found here on the site, using 100 ro water with the light and malty profile loaded. Does this seem correct?
I'd use less gypsum and more calcium chloride.
What would be the benefit of doing that? i guess i need to do more reading so I have a better understanding of what those two things change
Ah ok, thank you very much for clearing that up for me!Gypsum (sulfate) aids in the accentuation of hops in hoppy beers. Since this is a cream ale, I assume you don't want it to be overly hoppy. Chloride aids in bring out slightly more malt flavors.
Gypsum (sulfate) aids in the accentuation of hops in hoppy beers. Since this is a cream ale, I assume you don't want it to be overly hoppy. Chloride aids in bring out slightly more malt flavors.
Sulfate does not accentuate hops. It drys the beer's finish which can allow hopping and bittering to be more prominent in the flavor. If neither of those elements are really present in the recipe, the sulfate won't add them. Some sulfate in beers is helpful in clearing the palate and making the beer more drinkable.
Sulfate does not accentuate hops. It drys the beer's finish which can allow hopping and bittering to be more prominent in the flavor. If neither of those elements are really present in the recipe, the sulfate won't add them. Some sulfate in beers is helpful in clearing the palate and making the beer more drinkable.
Using calcium chloride and no gypsum would be great.
Based on the recco I'm adding 6g calcium CaCl for 30 gallons of water.
Just a heads up, but I believe you mean "6 tsp", not "6g". The Primer states 1 tsp / 5 gal. For 30 gallons, this would equal about 20g CaCl (assuming roughly 3.5g/tsp).
Why did the British Navy carry small beer on board its vessels?
Yes, water can go bad. Life is amazingly tennacious. Give it a carbon source (CO2 in the air), energy (heat) and a seed (spore) and it will develop in even pure water. Thus water stored in barrels on board ship went bad and had to be replaced by beer (one of the few good things about being in the British Navy from what I gather). At the same time, I have an RO system at home with a pressure tank and atmospheric tank. I am away 5 - 6 mos every summer and when I return in the fall the water in the pressure tank is fine. But I don't trust the water exposed to the air in the atmospheric tank and drain that when I go away.
I'd say that water that tastes and smells OK and doesn't have slimy things growing in it is fine for use in brewing.
I acknowledge this is probably a completely stupid question but my home brewer paranoia is kicking in. I use RO water I buy from a water store in sealed 5 gallons container. Fill your own jugs kind of place. For various reasons I haven't been able to brew when I expected to so by the time I use this water it will be about a month old since I got it. So the stupid question is, does it go stale, "bad"... after sitting around? If it somehow isn't as good as fresh water I'd rather just buy more when I will finally end up brewing. Thanks!