So....don't change the wiring on the 30?
also, the other breaker seems to be wired correctly based on the white wires being stacked, correct?
According to that cut sheet the breaker lugs should be labeled "load neutral" and "load power". Should be easy enough to confirm the connections black to load power and white to load neutral.
The comments in #90 were based on the breaker picture you posted in #81 which is not the same breaker as in #89 and I was typing those comments while you were posting those last two pictures. As I have no information about the breaker actually in the panel I can't say that the 50 Amp one is wired correctly. If it is not you would be having trouble with that circuit of the same sort you are having with the 30A circuit so I suppose it must be OK but I'd have your friend check it.
Long as white/neutral is on "load neutral" I'd re-install and let'er rip. With the white/load neutral part ensured, the order of red and black doesn't particularly matter because each will be on a hot leg either way.
Of course, the biggest lesson here is to have the right tools for the job...
-Kevin
Ding ding ding!! You were getting 1/4 power previously. Now you're getting full power. Great success. (And all done w/out a multi meter)
Ding ding ding!! You were getting 1/4 power previously. Now you're getting full power. Great success. (And all done w/out a multi meter)
Having about 7F overshoot so far. Maybe an Autotune? When I spoke to the tech guy at Aubern Instruments he said I did not need to do that, however I read on here where most say to do one.
lschiavo said:Sure. Two days and umpteen post later...I still think he should ask Santa for a multi meter.
ajdelange said:Were this controller really a PID controller then tuning would absolutely be necessary. But this isn't a PID controller - it uses fuzzy logic and my understanding is, appropriately enough, fuzzy. As the controller does have an autotune function I would assume that some sort of tuning is necessary. I would do an autotune. That should reduce your overshoot immediately. Even if the controller has algorithms that allow it to refine the 'tuneset' as it 'learns' you can shorten the learning period appreciably if you give it a good starting point.
The tuning parameters depend on the thermal mass of the load, the rate at which it loses heat, the rate at which the heater can supply heat and the rapidity with which the temperature of the load can change. Thus, and this is a common problem with PID control, a system tuned on 5 gallons of water isn't properly tuned for 6 gallons of mash.
I knew you guys could do it!!! I'll post one more when it's up on the final times. Having about 7F overshoot so far. Maybe an Autotune? When I spoke to the tech guy at Aubern Instruments he said I did not need to do that, however I read on here where most say to do one.
If it's holding a steady temperature, you should be able to adjust the temperature differential. I haven't done this step yet, but it's written up on Kal's website.
After re-reading, it may not be the right answer. You need to use the offest to compare your probe to a known temperature - so if the probe is reading really really icey water as 35* you know the offest is 3*. Your problem seems to be a tuning / autotune issue, and 'faking it' with the Pb adjustment may not be the right answer.
Sorry to point you in the wrong direction, though you should still calibrate your probe to a known temperature anyways.