Hello all! A few days ago I set up a 1.040 starter using a 2 month old (1st gen, from the lab) vial of WLP500, assumed to be at about 55% viability. Set up the wort just like all starters before (2L solution w/ DME + DAP), got the temperatures right before pitching--at about 71F (+/- 1 degree) 2L flask. I dropped in 1 drop of foam control right before setting it on the stir plate.
I've used foam control (FC) before in a starter (again just a drop), although I added this after strong fermentation (was heading towards overflow) previously. This time was only different in that I added the FC upon flipping the stir-switch. After observing very periodically throughout a solid 36-48 hours on the stir plate, I was worried because a Krausen never formed, although it did look like there was some kind of activity--I didn't exactly see what I expected in terms of little bubbles rising to the top, but there was something that resembled tiny bits of DME--although this could very well have been the yeasties.
Well after shutting off the stir plate 48 hours in, after only a few minutes it appeared there was a nice thick slury layer of yeast cells already collecting at the bottom (much more than in the original vial). I didn't think much more of it and set it in the fridge to flocculate the rest out for the subsequent decant.
24 hours later I'm ready to split off this amount for 2 seperate upcoming brews. I decide to bust out the hydrometer and measure the decanted wort. 1.040.
Did I not leave it long enough on the plate?! As said, I assumed I had propagation/attenuation due to the large amount of slurry. I also assumed it was okay to not have a Krausen because of the foam control (seemingly acceptable after researching other posts).
Based on the information provided, anyone have any ideas..namely from experience with either this strand (my first time using WLP500) or this viability (~55%) or this type of usage (foam control in starter) or this type of observation (thick slurry on bottom w/ no Krausen).. etc etc...?!
Not panicking by any means, but would like to have an idea of what to do next.. I'm assuming whipping up another batch of wort and going at it again.. I mean the hydrometer doesn't lie. Hmmm.
Thanks in advance for any input on the matter!
I've used foam control (FC) before in a starter (again just a drop), although I added this after strong fermentation (was heading towards overflow) previously. This time was only different in that I added the FC upon flipping the stir-switch. After observing very periodically throughout a solid 36-48 hours on the stir plate, I was worried because a Krausen never formed, although it did look like there was some kind of activity--I didn't exactly see what I expected in terms of little bubbles rising to the top, but there was something that resembled tiny bits of DME--although this could very well have been the yeasties.
Well after shutting off the stir plate 48 hours in, after only a few minutes it appeared there was a nice thick slury layer of yeast cells already collecting at the bottom (much more than in the original vial). I didn't think much more of it and set it in the fridge to flocculate the rest out for the subsequent decant.
24 hours later I'm ready to split off this amount for 2 seperate upcoming brews. I decide to bust out the hydrometer and measure the decanted wort. 1.040.
Did I not leave it long enough on the plate?! As said, I assumed I had propagation/attenuation due to the large amount of slurry. I also assumed it was okay to not have a Krausen because of the foam control (seemingly acceptable after researching other posts).
Based on the information provided, anyone have any ideas..namely from experience with either this strand (my first time using WLP500) or this viability (~55%) or this type of usage (foam control in starter) or this type of observation (thick slurry on bottom w/ no Krausen).. etc etc...?!
Not panicking by any means, but would like to have an idea of what to do next.. I'm assuming whipping up another batch of wort and going at it again.. I mean the hydrometer doesn't lie. Hmmm.
Thanks in advance for any input on the matter!