- Joined
- Jun 2, 2008
- Messages
- 64,951
- Reaction score
- 16,516
no it's not
How about whether its a good idea or not to ask for help on a paper you are writing on an internet forum?
Really, what are you writing this paper for? Or do you have too much free time?
'Secondary' fermentation.
Thanks everyone.
I'm betting it's a basic English Comp or Debate type class and he has to present an argument and he's deciding to do it based on his hobby. Pretty cool actually.
can't believe this one made it to the 4th page
It was listed in my first post.
How about whether its a good idea or not to ask for help on a paper you are writing on an internet forum?
Really, what are you writing this paper for? Or do you have too much free time?
Track vs. XCLet's try to keep it on track, ok?
Let's try to keep it on track, ok?
Sorry.Either stay on topic (we're in the BEER forum) or go into the chit-chat forum. Thanks!
'Secondary' fermentation.
Old school vs innovation would HAVE to be secondary or no secondary.
A secondary was INSISTED upon not even that many years ago, and I think the majority of brewers who follow modern practices would agree that a secondary is rarely necessary to prevent autolysis.
Or, maybe Hot Side Aeration?
Old school vs innovation would HAVE to be secondary or no secondary.
A secondary was INSISTED upon not even that many years ago, and I think the majority of brewers who follow modern practices would agree that a secondary is rarely necessary to prevent autolysis.
No chill may be able to be thrown in there as well?
The long primary thing is so 5 years ago for a lot of us.
How about Protein Rests (or any multiple-step mashes) v. Single infusion with the Modern highly-modified malts?
The only debated techniques with any heat in brewing would Gas vs Electric.
Track vs. XC
Shall we start a debate on whether people even KNOW the degree of the modification of their grain since they aren't buying full sacks?
Not listening to or taking Revvy's advice
Enter your email address to join: