For every brew session since I got my GF 15 months ago, I've used the formulas in the user's guide that came with the unit to compute the mash and sparge water volumes -- Mash = (Grain weight in lbs. x 0.34) + 0.9 US Gal; Sparge = (7.4 - mash volume) + (grain bill in lbs. x 0.1). I even uploaded a rather good set of tweaks for Beersmith that produced the rsame results. I've known for some time that the on-line calculator provided by the GF folks comes up with different results, but I've persisted with the formulas in the user's guide. Since I received my GF Connect unit (US version), I decided I might as well try to use the calculators in the GF Connect app -- in my case the Android version (still waiting for the promised new app, but am trying to use one of the "quick profiles" available in the current app) -- which provide yet a third set of figures. Specifically, for a basic brew using 11.5 lbs. of grain:
1) User's guide: mash = 4.81 gal. (19.24 qts.); sparge = 3.74 gal.; total = 8.55 gal.
2) OnLine: mash = 4.65 gal.; sparge = 3.59 gal.; total = 8.24
3) GF Connect quick profile: mash 4.6 gal.; sparge = 3.9 gal.; total = 8.5 gal.
Given that the Android app is still a work in progress, it's easy enough to simply ignore no. 3, but which is best between the other two? I'm inclined to go with the on-line version, but it does call for 0.31 gal. less in total water. Is that a problem? I'm perfectly happy with the results I've been getting so far, but I would be grateful for any advice in this matter.
+1 ^^^ this! I've also noticed the difference in the results using the formula from manual compared to the online results. I've tried both, and tbh, I prefer the manual's formula because it results in a slightly wetter mash, and I seem to get better conversion and less problems sparging. I don't worry if I get a little extra wort from it because I can either boil a little longer, or have a little extra in the fermenter. Since the beer is for my consumption (not a competition,) a couple of gravity points either way don't matter. EdI would uh just continue with whatever has been working. Why reinvent the wheel?
Riijnland
Can you post your beersmith tweaks please
I ordered a Graincoat directly from Grainfather.com and it was too short. I was not able to secure it using the velcro. So 3 days worth of correspondence with iMake (they respond once per day) and they said they would send me a new one. The second new Graincoat arrived today... guess what? Too Short again!! It looks like they have a bad batch from their supplier.Already posted boys...she won't fit...been there done that way back...just sayin' as I find some folks don't digest threads well or give feedback here...some...
I ordered a Graincoat directly from Grainfather.com and it was too short. I was not able to secure it using the velcro. So 3 days worth of correspondence with iMake (they respond once per day) and they said they would send me a new one. The second new Graincoat arrived today... guess what? Too Short again!! It looks like they have a bad batch from their supplier.
Quick pic of my setup....With extra screens in the bottom of mash shows how clean the tun looks when you lift it.
Hi. I used a SS splatter screen trimmed to same diameter as lower grain plate, but you can also use this screen from Ebay. EdWhere did you get your extra screens at? I have such a problem trying to keep the grains where they are supposed to be. I end up with a ton of them in the boil, and have to filter them out through a nylon hop bag on the way to the fermenter. It's a PITA
How did you guys cut it out? And did you guys only put one on the bottom, or the top one as well?
See post #1555 of how I did the bottom screens
I just used tin snips to cut the middle screen, the one from Ebay.
Also, please see post #2874. I just used heavy duty scissors to trim mine. I only use the fine screen, grain side up, on the lower (bottom) filter plate. The screen material is thin enough that both the screen plate and fine screen fit in the silicone border ring. Ed
Which SS Splatter Screen did you go with? I'd like to do this as well as it seems a handy way to avoid so many grains leftover after the mash.
Already ordered some tea balls, 2-3" (got several as I found them for $1-$1.50 each on ebay). Figured I might use some for hops and then cut one in half for the cap on the down spout.
Which SS Splatter Screen did you go with? I'd like to do this as well as it seems a handy way to avoid so many grains leftover after the mash.
Already ordered some tea balls, 2-3" (got several as I found them for $1-$1.50 each on ebay). Figured I might use some for hops and then cut one in half for the cap on the down spout.
Hi. Yes, I only use one fine mesh screen on the bottom plate, toward the grain. I believe the way Tang10 configured his was the GF bottom plate, the fine mesh screen toward the grain, the another domed false bottom plate (similar in style to the GF plate. EdOK so just to make sure I got this right,
@Tang,
You are using two screens on the bottom plate only, and using one screen on each side of it. So no screen for the top plate?
@redleg,
You are just using one screen, and it's on the bottom plate only, facing the grain side?
I'm just trying to figure out how many of those screens to order.
Hi. Yes, I only use one fine mesh screen on the bottom plate, toward the grain. I believe the way @tango configured his was the GF bottom plate, the fine mesh screen toward the grain, the another domed false bottom plate (similar in style to the GA plate. Ed
What do people think of using a false bottom connected with a hose to the pump inlet as a solution for a better hop screen? Seem like a bad idea?
Jamie, I don't imagine you'd have problems with water, but I'd be concerned when you were boiling wort that it might scorch under the screen. EdBoiled water without a problem
So no one has found a way to add a much larger bottom filter into the grainfather yet have they? That would be a HUGE advantage I would imagine.
It'll probably be good too, based on your sig. As Mark Watney said in the movie "The Martian," "I'm going to have to science the **** of this!" EdI have an idea for one possibly.
It'll probably be good too, based on your sig. As Mark Watney said in the movie "The Martian," "I'm going to have to science the **** of this!" Ed
That's about what I thought as well. I emailed Kal to see if he modified his original design to have one fit a Grainfather.
Enter your email address to join: