BudzAndSudz
Well-Known Member
Ok so the results are in!
I had made a 5 gallon batch with just 12lbs pale malt, tettnanger hops, and 2lbs turbinado sugar. Nice, simple recipe to really let the yeast shine. I split the batch between 4 different white labs strains, 500, 530, 550 and 570.
Out of my panel of taste testers (myself, SWMBO, and two friends) we all unanimously picked 530 as the best tasting. It had a delicate sweetness and fruitiness, subtle spicy phenolics and almost none of the tartness we found to be overwhelming in 570.
The problem here is that my goal is to make a Belgian Golden Strong Ale. This is pretty common knowledge that WLP530 is not the correct yeast for this style. If I brew this up, would this be the sort of thing that would get points docked at a BJCP event? I'm not worried about my house, I'm sure SWMBO and myself will drink the heck out of it (we chose it as the best, after all!) but if I decide to enter it in some competitions, I don't want to lose 10 points just because I went with a weird yeast.
Thoughts?
I had made a 5 gallon batch with just 12lbs pale malt, tettnanger hops, and 2lbs turbinado sugar. Nice, simple recipe to really let the yeast shine. I split the batch between 4 different white labs strains, 500, 530, 550 and 570.
Out of my panel of taste testers (myself, SWMBO, and two friends) we all unanimously picked 530 as the best tasting. It had a delicate sweetness and fruitiness, subtle spicy phenolics and almost none of the tartness we found to be overwhelming in 570.
The problem here is that my goal is to make a Belgian Golden Strong Ale. This is pretty common knowledge that WLP530 is not the correct yeast for this style. If I brew this up, would this be the sort of thing that would get points docked at a BJCP event? I'm not worried about my house, I'm sure SWMBO and myself will drink the heck out of it (we chose it as the best, after all!) but if I decide to enter it in some competitions, I don't want to lose 10 points just because I went with a weird yeast.
Thoughts?