SpanishCastleAle
Well-Known Member
Most people don't smoke and most people do not like the smell. So I would just do what the majority of your customers would prefer, no smoking inside.
Thanks! Here's some recent progress shots:
That's looking like it's shaping up. Keep posting pictures so we can all live the dream vicariously through you.
I will be thrilled to do so ! The brewing rooms are nearly finished (waiting on doors and floor paint), and as soon as I get my kettles and fermenters I'll throw everything in there and run some tests. The rest of the building is very close, I'd say 2 or 3 weeks away from being able to open.
I'll update with pics in another thread, and I'll link to it here soon.
Indeed it is a dream come true, and I am tremendously grateful to my cousin who believes in me so much to give me this opportunity (it is on his dime). I am incredibly lucky and I'm so happy to have this as a family project.
Cheers, see ya in another thread or hopefully in the pub !
I mean this in the nicest possible way.I mean this in the nicest possible way.
If I found out that a brewery had the choice to go non-smoking and chose smoking, I'd seriously question the integrity of the brewing process.
I'd ask myself, what other compromises were made.
Ask your smoking partners this: "How would you feel about a brewery adding a mildly carcinogenic compound to the beer because it would cater to more people?"
If BMC did that, you know you'd be all over that, even if it were trace amounts.
They changed the law a couple of years ago in Oregon. The State telling a business owner what perfectly legal actions can or cannot occur in their establishments?!?!?!?!?!?
I was a very strong opponent to the law when they were still deciding it.
Well, they passed it and smoking is now banned in all bars. Sucks right?
Hell no, I freaking LOVE IT!!!!! I can't believe that I used to sit in a smokey bar.
And I'm a smoker!
I mean this in the nicest possible way.
If I found out that a brewery had the choice to go non-smoking and chose smoking, I'd seriously question the integrity of the brewing process.
I'd ask myself, what other compromises were made.
Ask your smoking partners this: "How would you feel about a brewery adding a mildly carcinogenic compound to the beer because it would cater to more people?"
If BMC did that, you know you'd be all over that, even if it were trace amounts.
I mean this in the nicest possible way.
If I found out a brewery used this sort of convoluted non-logic, I'd seriously question their ability to even brew beer.
Geez, they are not adding carcinogens to the beer any more than you do everytime you drive a vehicle, mow your lawn, etc.
Drama queen post imo.
What brewery doesn't have the choice to go non-smoking? I've seen the anti-smoking laws but I have never in my life seen a law compelling a place to accommodate smokers.
Those places really believed that thier beer [needed to] be tasted and smelled under the best conditons, and they felt that a smoky room wasn't condusive to that.
I can't count the number of times I can smell someone's dope smoking in a car in front of me. When you smoke you lose the ability to smell and taste. Add THC to the mix and I think these guys think they are invisible too.
This poll saddens me, as someone who works for a cigar company.
Is that the place on 111, just before the Dunlap exit?
What I need to know is: will this brewpub be in Soddy? We need somewhere near that serves a decent pint. Beck's Dark at Steve's Landing just doesn't cut it. Also, Budzu, check your private messages.
What I need to know is: will this brewpub be in Soddy? We need somewhere near that serves a decent pint. Beck's Dark at Steve's Landing just doesn't cut it. Also, Budzu, check your private messages.
A deck out back could be done relatively cheap and I'd even be willing to help you build it!!1
As to the smoking, I've spoken my peace on the matter to everyone involved. At this point it is up the King. He has been reading this thread as well.