Actually, I said use google to search for peer reviewed journal articles.* I also said it would take seconds for you to do your own search and become modestly informed on a topic you purport to know so much about, stating as your main case that you don't want to spend the money on it.* That's not an argument about the cause/effect of conventional practices.
What I did not say, but you apparently assumed, is that organic farming is the solution for feeding the world's population.* Instead, I implied that the practices are less harmful to soil and groundwater.* Again, if you take the time to do the research, you'll be able to prove it to yourself, rather than having me hold your hand.* You've already proven you know how to find an article you think is reputable.
Oh, and I didn't ask you to believe in climate change either.* Actually, I never mentioned it.* Diversion is also not a compelling argument for your case.* Like you have been stating, just because you know how to read a journal article in one field,
doesn't necessarily mean you know the facts about this one.
What I did not say, but you apparently assumed, is that organic farming is the solution for feeding the world's population.* Instead, I implied that the practices are less harmful to soil and groundwater.* Again, if you take the time to do the research, you'll be able to prove it to yourself, rather than having me hold your hand.* You've already proven you know how to find an article you think is reputable.
Oh, and I didn't ask you to believe in climate change either.* Actually, I never mentioned it.* Diversion is also not a compelling argument for your case.* Like you have been stating, just because you know how to read a journal article in one field,
doesn't necessarily mean you know the facts about this one.