I would suspect that the process variables are set up differently in each case. Is the water requirement the same for both programs? Are your losses to trub, dead space, and chiller the same? Is the boil off rate set the same for both programs? Are the Lovibond and pppg for the grains the same in both recipes?
Additionally for IBU, are they both using the same equation for calculation of IBU?
Most of the time, large differences such as you are experiencing end up being a difference in process: water losses and usage set by each program. If you enter the same recipe into both and do not configure the process variables, the software for each makes different assumptions.
The IBU percentage is different for Whirlpools because one says to have it at 50% and the other says 10%. The whirlpool IBU's actually match on one recipe that I have put into each program, but then a different recipe has different whirlpool IBU's between two recipes.
So what are we trying to understand, here?
Each program has a foundation of assumptions to start with. Each has controls available to the brewer. Even if they differ at the start, if you hone each to your particular circumstance, the numbers begin to move closer.
Will they agree with all numbers? Nope.
Is there just one way to brew? Nope
Can either program anticipate every brewer's circumstance or experiments? Nope.
Is everything about brewing understood and modeled perfectly? Hell Nope.
The IBU percentage is different for Whirlpools because one says to have it at 50% and the other says 10%. The whirlpool IBU's actually match on one recipe that I have put into each program, but then a different recipe has different whirlpool IBU's between two recipes.
Enter your email address to join: