GregR
Well-Known Member
No, and it is spelled "horses". Nothing to do with horses!!
equilibrium?
No, and it is spelled "horses". Nothing to do with horses!!
Durrrhurhurhurhur!
Sorry. See the link in the next post to the BEAR in the primary thread.
So suck your coffee back up and read the damn thread!!!lol
Equestrian!
yeah, equilibrium. it means horses.
I'll do what I want whilst you shut your yapper!
No, and it is spelled "horses". Nothing to do with horses!!
Well someone has never been to the "Great White North" It is HOSERS, as in You're a Hoser Eh?
I know, I was playing along with teh (the) spelling game.
Supposably.Irregardless is the worst abused non-word evr.
My favorite one to get torqued over is "druck" instead of "drunk."
The only time that's acceptable is if you actually ARE.
Irregardless is a perfectly cromulent word!
In fact, it embiggens me to use it!
Haha- you sound like Yuri now.
I'm not really a grammar nazi, but the one that gets me is "your". Your, you're, and worse, ur, are NOT interchangeable.
I'm now an old lady (grandma and all), but the other thing I can't get is textspeak. If you can't even spend the time to type out "you", and use punctuation, I can't spend the time formulating an answer to your (youre, ur) question.
Quick! How many steps between Kevin Bacon and Miss Piggy?
Um, Bacon? Pig? ONE! Or 75
legendary e-mail from former boob of a boss I had as a fresh-out...
"It's a loose-louse situation"....
EPIC. you can't make that stuff up.
I like Indian pale ale.You never hear anyone say, "Hey try this Germany Pils!" or "I'm brewing an America Amber tomorrow."
asian and oriental. but don't try to correct anyone who gets it wrong or you'll just end up with that zombie stare for twenty minutes.
Ooh, I love these threads.
should HAVE, not "should of" (also, would and could)
...and everyone who is not currently or formerly the Queen's subject, stop using the word "whilst"!
There, I said it.
Enter your email address to join: