New Giveaway - Wort Monster Conical Fermenter!

Home Brew Forums > Home Brewing Beer > Recipes/Ingredients > Imperial stout verses Imperial porter




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2006, 07:25 PM   #1
Brewpastor
Beer, not rocket science
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Brewpastor's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Corrales, New Mexico
Posts: 4,579
Liked 25 Times on 23 Posts

Default Imperial stout verses Imperial porter

Imperial Stout verses Imperial Porter , what would be the difference? I really love Stone's Imperial Stout. It is big and hoppy like their Ruination IPA but very roasty and malty. So it would be nice to make one. But then I was thinking I really like porters more then I like stout so I put together an Imperial Porter recipe (which I have posted: http://www.homebrewtalk.com/showthread.php?t=13428)

What I am interested in is a general discussion of what this beer should be like and how it would differ from an Imperial Stout.

I was thinking it would be different in the use of chocolate and black malt as opposed to roasted barley and Black Patent malt. My guess is the IBUs would be huge. My recipe has 100+ IBUs (my Imperial IPA has 200+). What do you all think about these styles and how they should copare/differ?


__________________
Before I learned to brew I was poor, sober and lonely. Now I am just poor.
Brewpastor is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-12-2006, 07:46 PM   #2
Brewpastor
Beer, not rocket science
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Brewpastor's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Corrales, New Mexico
Posts: 4,579
Liked 25 Times on 23 Posts

Default

12C. Baltic Porter

Aroma: Rich malty sweetness often containing caramel, toffee, nutty to deep toast, and/or licorice notes. Complex alcohol and ester profile of moderate strength, and reminiscent of plums, prunes, raisins, cherries or currants, occasionally with a vinous Port-like quality. Some darker malt character that is deep chocolate, coffee or molasses but never burnt. No hops. No sourness. Very smooth.
Appearance: Dark reddish copper to opaque dark brown (not black). Thick, persistent tan-colored head. Clear, although darker versions can be opaque.
Flavor: As with aroma, has a rich malty sweetness with a complex blend of deep malt, dried fruit esters, and alcohol. Has a prominent yet smooth schwarzbier-like roasted flavor that stops short of burnt. Mouth-filling and very smooth. Clean lager character; no diacetyl. Starts sweet but darker malt flavors quickly dominates and persists through finish. Just a touch dry with a hint of roast coffee or licorice in the finish. Malt can have a caramel, toffee, nutty, molasses and/or licorice complexity. Light hints of black currant and dark fruits. Medium-low to medium bitterness from malt and hops, just to provide balance. Perhaps a hint of hop flavor.
Mouthfeel: Generally quite full-bodied and smooth, with a well-aged alcohol warmth (although the rarer lower gravity Carnegie-style versions will have a medium body and less warmth). Medium to medium-high carbonation, making it seem even more mouth-filling. Not heavy on the tongue due to carbonation level.
Overall Impression: A Baltic Porter often has the malt flavors reminiscent of an English brown porter and the restrained roast of a schwarzbier, but with a higher OG and alcohol content than either. Very complex, with multi-layered flavors.
History: Traditional beer from countries bordering the Baltic Sea. Derived from English porters but influenced by Russian Imperial Stouts.
Comments: May also be described as an Imperial Porter, although heavily roasted or hopped versions should be entered as either Imperial Stouts or specialty beers. An ABV of 7 - 8.5% is most typical.
Ingredients: Generally lager yeast (cold fermented if using ale yeast). Debittered chocolate or black malt. Munich or Vienna base malt. Continental hops. May contain crystal malts and/or adjuncts. Brown or amber malt common in historical recipes.
Vital Statistics:
OGFGIBUsSRMABV1.060 - 1.0901.016 - 1.02420 - 4017 - 305.5 - 9.5%

Commercial Examples: Sinebrychoff Porter (Finland), Zywiec Porter (Poland), Baltika Porter (Russia), Carnegie Stark Porter (Sweden), Dojlidy Polski (Poland), Aldaris Porteris (Latvia), Utenos Porter (Lithuania), Kozlak Porter (Poland), Stepan Razin Porter (Russia)


__________________
Before I learned to brew I was poor, sober and lonely. Now I am just poor.
Brewpastor is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-12-2006, 07:48 PM   #3
Brewpastor
Beer, not rocket science
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
Brewpastor's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Corrales, New Mexico
Posts: 4,579
Liked 25 Times on 23 Posts

Default

Which would mean the hops in my recipe should be cut in half

__________________
Before I learned to brew I was poor, sober and lonely. Now I am just poor.
Brewpastor is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-12-2006, 09:57 PM   #4
sonvolt
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 902
Liked 7 Times on 5 Posts

Default

Stout vs. Porter = Stouts should have no Black Patent malt, Porters should.

This is speaking in historical terms of course, I've seen all kinds of stouts using Black Patent, but it is not really a historical trait of the style.

IMO, a stout should be roastier than a porter, too.

__________________
sonvolt is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-16-2011, 03:45 PM   #5
Delaney
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 486
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

I was reading a book on Porters by Michael Jackson recently. There is a fine line between Porters and Stouts...and it is gray at that.

Because the two styles can be very similar, a beer could sometimes fall into either category, and it is often up to the brewer to decide what style it should be referred to as.

According to the book I read, the flavor and aroma of a porter should come through as a single flavor/aroma. With a stout, there should be more than one flavor/aroma which are distinguishable to the pallet. To me this is the determining factor, so long as your SRM, ABV, IBUs and debatedly malt types allow your brew to fall into either category.

__________________
Delaney is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-16-2011, 05:47 PM   #6
shanecb
Kvlt Brewer
HBT_SUPPORTER.png
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
 
shanecb's Avatar
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,139
Liked 19 Times on 17 Posts
Likes Given: 9

Default

I no longer see much of a different between stout and porter (to an extent). Even the ingredient guidelines always come off as technical crap to me, since there are countless examples of "violations". I just look at it as a continuum anymore, starting down at the brown porter and running the gamut up to Russian Imperial Stout. It's really once you get into the middle of the range that things get hazy.

It's just that I've had "stouts" that I would have said were porters, and "porters" that I would have said are stouts. There's definitely a gray line there.

I really like this write up here: http://zythophile.wordpress.com/2009/03/19/so-what-is-the-difference-between-porter-and-stout/

__________________
A particular love for ancient, obsolete, or lesser-known style from both the US and abroad.

We are the Sons of Winter and Stars
We ́ve come from a far beyond time
Forever the fire burns in our hearts
Our world shall never die
- Wintersun
shanecb is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-16-2011, 11:14 PM   #7
Bonde
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Denmark
Posts: 110
Liked 1 Times on 1 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

Well, in the old days it was used to be called a Porter Stout/Stout porter when a porter became stronger than usual (or was it the other way around). At least thats what i've read in a describtion of English beer history. But guess the storys vary a bit from book to book. But Stout just equeals storng right?

As i've understod it, an imperial Stout is just an extra hopped strong Porter. Imperial Porter = Extra hopped porter/doubbel brown :-)

__________________
Bonde is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-19-2011, 02:02 PM   #8
Delaney
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 486
Liked 14 Times on 14 Posts
Likes Given: 15

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonde View Post
Well, in the old days it was used to be called a Porter Stout/Stout porter when a porter became stronger than usual (or was it the other way around). At least thats what i've read in a describtion of English beer history. But guess the storys vary a bit from book to book. But Stout just equeals storng right?

As i've understod it, an imperial Stout is just an extra hopped strong Porter. Imperial Porter = Extra hopped porter/doubbel brown :-)
imperial stout is usually higher alcohol percentage.
Just look at the recipes, you'll notice differences, but you'll also notice the fine line where a beer can be regarded as either a porter or a stout.
__________________
Delaney is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-19-2011, 06:46 PM   #9
Guess42
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 163
Liked 4 Times on 4 Posts

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sonvolt View Post
Stout vs. Porter = Stouts should have no Black Patent malt, Porters should.

This is speaking in historical terms of course, I've seen all kinds of stouts using Black Patent, but it is not really a historical trait of the style.

IMO, a stout should be roastier than a porter, too.
Courage russian imperial stout might have something to say about this.
__________________
Guess42 is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 09-20-2011, 08:59 AM   #10
StMarcos
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Recipes 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sebastopol, CA
Posts: 938
Liked 27 Times on 23 Posts
Likes Given: 1

Default

I always thought stout needed some rb in it. My oat stout has choc, rb, and bp, and I don't think it tastes out of style. To me, bp has a charcoal-like dustiness to it, whereas rb has more of a sour twang.



__________________
StMarcos is offline
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porter Justice - Imperial Porter - HBT BJCP #3 BOS usurpers26 Porter 12 03-25-2014 11:18 PM
Austin Homebrew Rogue Imperial IPA clone not an Imperial IPA? dzamba All Grain & Partial Mash Brewing 26 06-02-2009 09:18 PM
Imperial Porter recipe? mullimat Recipes/Ingredients 1 01-13-2009 12:46 AM
Porter and Imperial Oatmeal Stout Nail Polish Flavors Matt Up North General Beer Discussion 2 01-01-2009 01:32 AM
Modified Imperial Porter Jaeger48 Extract Brewing 8 12-26-2008 04:14 PM