• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

WLP568 fermentation

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

JHELLERBREW

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just brewed a saison on 8/12. This was my first time using WLP568. Fermentation is aggressive and I'm feeling encouraged thus far. I was hoping someone could guide me in either using a secondary fermentor or just having a longer primary. This is my first non pale-ale homebrew, and I don't know whether or not 568 benefits from longer exposure in the primary (to clean up off flavors) or if the beer would benefit from being removed from the yeast cake. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers!!!
 
Most folks will tell you that secondary is not really necessary unless you are dry-hopping, racking onto fruit, etc.

My vote would be to leave it in primary. The saison yeasts tend to have a really long fermentation anyway, and it would be a shame to rack it off too soon. Leave it in there for a month or so and you should be good.
 
568 is a blend of saison and non-saison Belgian yeasts, specifically tailored to avoid long and/or stuck fermentations. You shouldn't need a month in primary. 2-3 weeks, or whenever gravity stabilizes, and you're done.
 
568 is a blend of saison and non-saison Belgian yeasts, specifically tailored to avoid long and/or stuck fermentations.

This is true, and the real benefit to using 568 over 565; however, I did find that it took me a month -- obviously, every fermentation is different. However, the real truth is that there's no real rule-of-thumb: yr beer's done when yr beer's done (e.g. when the gravity stabilizes). :D
 
C'mon, we live in Texas. We can put 565 in the garage and have it be ready to bottle in 48 hours!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top