I use 11 and I like it very much, I haven't had any issue's other than some slowness from too much security
Most of what I currently do with my laptop (Windows 10) could be done with WiFi disabled. The other activities require a web browser.My Windows 10 laptop only serves as a home theater PC. I expect I'll install Ubuntu on it when Win10 “dies."
... and maybe you can run Win 11 on ARMSOC devices or ARM/GPU systems.
There are a handful of non-Intel hardware architectures that Windows used to run on.... and maybe you can run Win 11 on ARMSOC devices or ARM/GPU systems
For fun, I looked at Dell and learned I could buy a Qualcomm Snapdragon-powered Win11 Inspiron 14 (fanless, 3.18 lbs., 1920x1080, 8MB) for $300 today. I don't want it, though it could make a fine machine if Ubuntu runs on itWindows on ARM probably will not be on my "let's take a look at it" list
What would Frank Zappa (or Nanook of the North) have to say about MS "spyware"? I think you've nailed it, @balrog .Great Googly Moogly
Seeing as how I work in tech, I feel like I should "get" what MS is driving at here. It really just seems like an ARM based PC. There's obviously going to be compatibility problems as the vast majority of applications for windows are not compiled for ARM. Does the average user need/want this AI feature?The way MS has binded "Recall" to Qualcomm's SnapdragonX SOCs for their NPUs is curious considering there are GPUs that sport an order of magnitude higher TOPs. Perhaps they just picked the easiest to implement for the initial release, because - for example - the NVIDIA RTX 4090 that companies are still spending stupid money on for AI and was banned for sale to the PRC has at least 10x more hardware available to inference engines in the form of Tensor cores...
Cheers!
Good lord that’s a mouthful of acronymic grape nuts to chew through, @day_trippr !
Have you looked at the AI related sessions from Build 2024?Seeing as how I work in tech, I feel like I should "get" what MS is driving at here.
No serious PC is gonna run on ARM any time soon. I'd guess that MS compiling for ARM architecture is another failed attempt to get into mobile/?? space.Seeing as how I work in tech, I feel like I should "get" what MS is driving at here. It really just seems like an ARM based PC. There's obviously going to be compatibility problems as the vast majority of applications for windows are not compiled for ARM. Does the average user need/want this AI feature?
In my world, ARM is king. I'm a designer of things, and almost all of my things are ARM M0 - M4. But for the desktop, Intel/AMD are so far advanced. I don't game, but I build a new PC ever few years and it's incredible what I'm running right now. Not ARM territory.I wouldn't be quite so quick to dismiss the evolution of ARM architecture at this point. There is a fairly decent threat to Intel's traditional CISC designs and marketing thereof that could gain momentum with Microsoft's encouragement...
Cheers!
well yea... I'm a bricklayer.You're living in a silo. You need to get out more.
fwiw, I have almost a dozen US patents on computer architecture...
Cheers!
Yeah, but absolutely no mention of VR or hacking NORAD.I learned something new about day-trippr today.
"Serious" is a somewhat flexible term.No serious PC is gonna run on ARM any time soon.