- Joined
- Nov 26, 2013
- Messages
- 9,918
- Reaction score
- 24,072
shop is barely 15 x 12
Luckily a small batch, but yeah, not happy.Ouch.![]()
"LUXURY!"
All "Four Yorkshiremen" aside, that is nice setup. My shop area is longer but more narrow and all operations must be painfully planned out in advance.
(not a great shot of the shop)
View attachment 697757
All good Hoppy. I transferred what was supposed to be my British Golden but color suggest more a British Brown...Its got English malt, English hops so I'll just be hoppy..ah, I mean happy....to settle on English style type beer....ale....as long as it's drinkable!Went to bottle a dunkels weissbier, but discovered a pellical.Soooo, Dopplebock was bottled.
View attachment 697483
just looking at that second shot, I feel like I could be in a local hardware store...yeesh!!
[T]hen spent the afternoon sanding, filling and priming.
I wasn't going to get both top coats done today anyway, but I can tomorrow, so it's a wash.
My first 3 lagers I used Diamond Since it’s what was in stock. What didn’t you like about it? Any comparisons? i have 34/70 for the next few. I have onlt been able to drink the first of those lagers and really liked it. The second is ready to drink Tuesday and Third was just bottledI made a Helles today and thankfully returned to the loving embrace of 34/70 after my disastrous dalliance with Diamond Lager.
My first 3 lagers I used Diamond Since it’s what was in stock. What didn’t you like about it? Any comparisons? i have 34/70 for the next few. I have onlt been able to drink the first of those lagers and really liked it. The second is ready to drink Tuesday and Third was just bottled
Stick with 34/70! Tried and trustedIf you look at page 7043 of the What Are You Drinking Now thread, you'll see a more detailed post outlining my struggles with Diamond. Bear in mind that my lager recipes are established and have a reliable track record with 34/70. Working on the assumption that Diamond is just a more reasonably priced version of 34/70, I treated it as such. Unfortunately, it didn't seem to perform that way on the series of beers that I brewed with Diamond.
In short: 1) At identical pitching rates, Diamond was very sluggish below 55F. In fact, it didn't do much of anything until I raised it to 55F. 2) It posted noticeably and consistently lower attenuation rates than 34/70, even when I strongly encouraged it to consume the last few points by raising it into the mid-60s, then left it for an extended D-rest at 70F. On the plus side, when it's done, it's done and it flocs hard. 3) The beers produced by Diamond aren't terribly crisp and they drink more like a mock lager (Pacman strain at 55F sorta thing). Diamond produces a beautiful roundness and softness that I think would be exceptional in a cream ale or American wheat, but that's not what I want in a lager--and that's not what 34/70 does.
My experience with Diamond seems to be way, way outside the norm. So much so, in fact, that I'm starting to wonder if my packages may have been mis-labeled, or perhaps one of the sachets that I pitched was mis-picked, I was too stupid to notice the error, and I inadvertently pitched a hybrid strain of Diamond and a packet of something else. My results are so far outside the norm that something bizarre like that must've happened.
What's your high level process for fresh hop batches? I have two Northern Brewer fresh hop ales going to try out #1. 1) boiled with pellets for an BU/GU ratio of about 60%, then dumped in 1.5 pounds of fresh hops at flame out and let cool naturally, and 2) BU/GU ratio with pellets to ~60% then fresh hops 1/4# at 15, 10, 5 and 0 minutes and chilled. Both in fermenters now.Picked my 2020 hops and put a West coast medley of 2019 hops in a Randallizer with a Blonde Ale.