booherbg
Well-Known Member
Hi everyone. Simple question. I made two beers with the same amount of dry-hopping but they turned out much different.
One was a two hearted clone (extract + steep) with .2oz per gallon Centennial 9% pellets. 55IBU, 6% ABV, 1.011 FG 2-row extract, vienna, 60L crystal, cara-pils all centennial hops;Safale-US05
The other was an american strong ale (partial mash + 2-row extract) with .1oz/gal of Centennial 9% with .1oz/gal of 13% Columbus. 60IBU, 6.8% ABV, 1.028 FG. 2-row + extract, 150L crystal, touch of biscuit malt. Magnum and Centennial for bittering, Centennial and Cascade for late additions. Safale-US05
The fermentation temps were the same, dry hop duration was the same.
The 2-hearted was exploding with delicious centennial hop aroma. The strong ale does not have hardly any hop aroma to it whatsoever. The two-hearted was first drank after 3 weeks in bottle, admittedly I have only had one of the strong ales after only 1 week in bottle.
The 2-hearted had an amazing head (from carapils most likely) that stayed through the duration of the drink. The strong ale didn't have much of a head, but it was only a week old.
Could it be that the carapils (and therefor the huge head) is what releases the hop aroma from the dry hop? Or is there some other factor that I'm not considering that would cause the beer to not show the properties of the dry hop? I really cannot find any resources that suggest a dry hop would "not work". I'm curious about what your thoughts are.
One was a two hearted clone (extract + steep) with .2oz per gallon Centennial 9% pellets. 55IBU, 6% ABV, 1.011 FG 2-row extract, vienna, 60L crystal, cara-pils all centennial hops;Safale-US05
The other was an american strong ale (partial mash + 2-row extract) with .1oz/gal of Centennial 9% with .1oz/gal of 13% Columbus. 60IBU, 6.8% ABV, 1.028 FG. 2-row + extract, 150L crystal, touch of biscuit malt. Magnum and Centennial for bittering, Centennial and Cascade for late additions. Safale-US05
The fermentation temps were the same, dry hop duration was the same.
The 2-hearted was exploding with delicious centennial hop aroma. The strong ale does not have hardly any hop aroma to it whatsoever. The two-hearted was first drank after 3 weeks in bottle, admittedly I have only had one of the strong ales after only 1 week in bottle.
The 2-hearted had an amazing head (from carapils most likely) that stayed through the duration of the drink. The strong ale didn't have much of a head, but it was only a week old.
Could it be that the carapils (and therefor the huge head) is what releases the hop aroma from the dry hop? Or is there some other factor that I'm not considering that would cause the beer to not show the properties of the dry hop? I really cannot find any resources that suggest a dry hop would "not work". I'm curious about what your thoughts are.