FAJC tastes too cooked for my preference, and its tendency for a one-note nature could have covered some of the more interesting and subtle character the apples may have displayed.
without specifics on the phenolics one judge might have detected (I'm not giving them the benefit of the doubt, as they used the word "or") I can't really guess what they're referring to. Excessive green apple candy can definitely be off-putting, as could excessive recent malic with the sort of metallic harshness it has. it's tough to say, sorry.
I'd also consider the strong possibility that you know more about cider than them. Cider judging is extremely hit and miss in this country right now. I could review it if you want to send to the midwest. I have a 90 on the beta Cider Judge exam if that matters.
If people are looking for a certain character to be added by the yeast that's fine, but it's not what I'm trying to make with cider. I want my yeast to stay out of the way. And in a competition I am not going to particularly enjoy a "yeasty" cider and I haven't thus far enjoyed the ones with strong yeast components. it's a wine with apples, basically. Purity of fruit, without seeming raw/unfermented or cooked. (tricky; sometimes a more warm "baked apple" can be inviting whereas the one-note cooked FAJC is not IMO)
FWIW I like to backsweeten to a lower number for competition, and have some favorite aromatic juices saved for that ~4 gravity points or so. More than that I'll add a touch of ice cider but I have to be careful there too or it ends up tasting like brown sugar.