I think this thread shoulda had a poll to it. Of course now it would be doubtful if folks would go back and add their votes to a poll, but it would be nice. Especially a public poll with who does which on it....
What is your efficiency? I get over 80 with a single sparge. I am sure 85% is possible but I don't want astringency. I have heard there is even less risk with no sparge. If I can get 75 that way and have a tastier wort, save time, it seems like a big win.
Steelers77 said:I use a hybrid method:
I drain my mash tun an put first runnings on the stove to heat and set profile. Then fill tun with enought water to get my grainbed to mashout temp, recirc, then start running that off. While I'm draining I top off mash tun with remaining sparge water as needed until desired volum is reached. I've got up 89% eff with this method without a hint of astringency (I do acidify my spare water).
JeffS said:I batch sparge. My efficiency sucks (like 65%) but I think it has to do with the crush of the grain since it dropped when I moved and started going to a new LHBS.
I used to batch sparge, but I fly sparge now. For some reason I like how long it takes, and I like getting the perfect flow from HLT to MT to BK.
Then again I have a lot of free time.
Fly sparge. I just set my flow rate and check it every 10 minutes or so. I don't see myself ever switching.
double batch sparge. Seemed like the easiest way for my setup and just haven't changed. I've got so much equipment laying around my house I think a fly sparge arm would just be another thing to worry about.