• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Stratification of gases in closed environments (Like fermentors and kegs)

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Maybe there is a chemistry graduate student that could take on experiments that measure O2 adsorption of wort/beer over time in a brewing environment. It does seem that everyone is in more or less agreement that the CO2 blanket concept is a misnomer and at worse, a misunderstanding of gas and laws of physics. It is a very interesting discussion however.

I have a few practical application or technique questions then, since this seems counter to many homebrewer's observations:
1. Yeast take up O2 (dissolved in the wort, not from the air) at least in the lag phase and past primary fermentation this is often believed to help prevent oxidation (I wish I could remember where I heard or read this). This appears to be untrue - as I have heard many BJCP judges state the same as Yooper. Bottle conditioned beer then should not be oxidized, unless oxidation occurred before or during bottling, correct? It seems that some people (award winning brewers) have a handle on this - and the general wisdom is the CO2 blanket idea. Everyone I have talked to supports the idea of a blast of CO2 protects the surface of beer when handling/transferring.
2. This may mean that "purging" techniques may only be effective if done specifically to introduce a high pressure differential at the bottom of a vessel (assuming the opening or valve is at atmospheric pressure) - expanding CO2 mechanically "pushing" out much of the ambient gasses like a rocket - for example - purging an empty corny using the liquid side and dip tube to put 3-5 lbs of pressure into the bottom accelerating the gas out through an open top or the pressure release valve. I am guessing this is slightly less effective than pushing a corny full of water or sanitizer out with CO2? or not? Same process for counter pressure bottle fillers that allow a burst of CO2 to purge the bottle before filling.
3. When using a secondary (very rare for me), it seems common sense to eliminate the beer surface area contact with air filling to the neck of the carboy, but not always practical. I have tried both the CO2 purge and the technique of adding a minimum sugar addition to allow new fermentation to create CO2 - and hoping that bubbling activity would provide a barrier between the beer and air. Or does the immediate application of an airlock trap the "air" causing it to mix homogeneously into the producing CO2 until the pressure begins to expel gas through the airlock?

Yes, occasionally I get oxidized beer. Sucks. Happens less and less the better care I take in handling.

I just read back through this and not sure I made a whole lot of sense. Perhaps I answered my own questions by assuming that we need to treat beer delicately through any transfer or exposure to air (or better in a sealed environment under pressure), and that most serious oxidation occurs when wort/beer is splashed or agitated (oxygenation by mechanical means), and natural aging oxidation occurs as O2 transfers through plastic, wood and or metal by passive means. It seems both can be addressed by proper processes and proper handling and storage, minimized but never completely avoided.
 
Slight oxidation flavors can be very pleasant- a "sherry" or sweet-ish "brandy" flavor is most common and very nice in barleywines and in some other dark beers.

This is an interesting concept to me. I have always thought of oxidation as 100% bad. So do you think preventing a barleywine from getting any oxidation might effect the flavor profile negatively? Traditionally brewers did not know the science behind brewing as much as we do today and the styles we know and love today reflect their processes. So might we, by protecting certain styles too much, deviate from the spirit of the style?
 
The key to a great cask isn't the "bound up" oxygen, but instead that the cask is emptied before the beer deteriorates to an objectionable flavor.

You can taste it- the first pint is much different than the last pint as the beer oxidizes.

Slight oxidation flavors can be very pleasant- a "sherry" or sweet-ish "brandy" flavor is most common and very nice in barleywines and in some other dark beers. They aren't great in pale ales, though, and of course they worsen with time. A slight flavor of oxidation today could be cardboard flavor in 2 months.

I didn't mean that the bound up oxygen is the key to the taste, but that some oxidation is part of the taste of English cask beer, and the beer improves from it for maybe a day or so from the first beer being drawn out of the cask (the beer is brewed for cask serving, remember, so some oxidation products are part of the desired character), before it starts to spoil. When that oxidation happens it will use up some of the oxygen in cask. If only a small amount is admitted or present at filling or tapping and the vessel then sealed and/or backfilled with CO2, then oxidation will only go so far, and no further, because all of the oxygen present has been bound up in the oxidation products, and you can continue to store the beer in that state for some time without spoilage. The oxidation is only going to worsen with time if there is too much oxygen present, or if there is a continuous source of oxygen (or possibly if the oxidized compounds catalyze a different reaction that spoils the beer without additional oxygen). With a cask breather backfilling the cask with CO2, cask beer can be stored and served after tapping (which introduces some oxygen) for a month or so at cellar temperatures without significant change, if not much longer, despite the small amount of oxidation that will have occurred.
 
This is an interesting concept to me. I have always thought of oxidation as 100% bad. So do you think preventing a barleywine from getting any oxidation might effect the flavor profile negatively? Traditionally brewers did not know the science behind brewing as much as we do today and the styles we know and love today reflect their processes. So might we, by protecting certain styles too much, deviate from the spirit of the style?

No, I think you still have to do everything in your power to prevent oxidation- as the oxidation you taste in long-bottled beers comes from the minute oxidation at bottling that gets more noticeable and stronger with time.

As an example, my neighbor gave me "plum brandy". I know it's not beer- but its the best example I have! Anyway, he made it 25+ years ago, as a high ABV plum wine. He forgot about it for at least 15 of those years, and then gifted us with a bottle about 3 years ago (the last one). Well, it wasn't actually a bottle of wine like you'd think of it- more like a jug!

This "plum brandy" is great! It's brownish in color, sherry notes predominate, and it has a sweet brandy-like finish. It's because the wine is greatly oxidized- the brown color, the sherry/madieria notes, the "brandy" finish- all point to oxidation.

The oxidation is technically a flaw- but it's awesome in this after dinner drink. I've shared this with some HBT forum members (we still have half a jug!) like Homercidal and Pappers (I think Pappers) and many others- and they could tell you what they think- but it's definitely an after-dinner sipper like cognac would be.

One of the interesting things I've noticed about oxidation is that it seems to affect some ingredients differently. For example, oxidation in a beer with roasted grains (say, an ESB or a stout) tends to be metallic in nature. In a beer with dark crystal malts, it seems to have that "sherry" flavor. That's a generalization, of course, but it's something I've noticed over the last 7 or 8 years of beer tasting/judging.
 
Back
Top