theveganbrewer
Well-Known Member
Had a winning comment on this beer last night. Gave a bottle to my brother and he took a sip and said, "this tastes just the that beer you gave me with the gargoyle on it."
Had a winning comment on this beer last night. Gave a bottle to my brother and he took a sip and said, "this tastes just the that beer you gave me with the gargoyle on it."
He just got initiated to the world of Stone Clones and it seems you did a really good job on this one. Keep it up and keep it hoppy!
PS: Speaking of hoppy, I ordered some Columbus rhizomes this year (next yrs crop). I 'd rather go with Centennial or Chinook but Rebel Brewer was out of stock. Made any decent CTZ IPAs?
Nothing with the CTZ, though I have a pound of them in the freezer. If I get something good I'll pm you.
Anyone try bairds light carastan in this or have thoughts on how it would affect the recipe? I've recently been trying the regular and light carastan in a couple recipes and like the result.
CastleBlack said:I am all for experimenting Jim but I think with carastan you would get something like an english pale ale at best or a light brown ale at worse. Its just not my thing personally. I would change the c-20 its there to promote the hops I think. This beer is an IBU monster, I wouldnt want it maltier than it already it.
On the other hand I am a fool for American type ales, so there is my bias. If you make it let us know how it went.
Happy brewing to ya.
Thanks for the feedback. My thought process was that carastan would be more of a sweet toffee flavor with more toast whereas the C20 would be just plain sweet.
Looks like inversion ipa from deschutes uses a mix of carastan and crystal. Think I'll go this route!
CastleBlack said:Yup its toffee like alright, but I am not sure you are gonna get that with the light version of it, specially considering that the plain carastan is already not so toffee like (special B now thats toffee to the max!). I think Ruination has a good balance between hops and malt, perhaps a mix might be a good idea. That would set you in the right path for such future experiments too.
Its actually not a bad idea, I highly encourage it.
Happy brewing.
scottland said:I de-carbonated, and took a sample of real Ruination tonight. FG is 1.011 in case anyone is wondering
I de-carbonated, and took a sample of real Ruination tonight. FG is 1.011 in case anyone is wondering
scottland said:I de-carbonated, and took a sample of real Ruination tonight. FG is 1.011 in case anyone is wondering
This is on my brew schedule for the weekend. I've three different yeasts in the bank and I'm trying to decide on and I want to get the started kicked off Wed.
My Choices are:
WLP039 (Notty)
PacMan
San Diego Super Strain
All of these are high attenuators -- any recommendations?
So mine went through a weird period after about 4 weeks in the bottle. At 2 weeks, the flavor was great but it still needed more carbonation, of course. At 4 it seemed like the body had dropped out and the good flavor with it. I was heartbroken. But now at 7 weeks or so it seems to be on the upswing. I don't think I've evr had a beer get worse before it gets better. Have certainly had them be not great and get much better. This is not a knock on the recipe, I'm sure it has to do with my process rather than the recipe. Anyway, just thought I'd note this. But it's turning back into greatness!
Bad bottle perhaps?
I have been drinking this clone for a couple of weeks now. I think it is actually better than the original in a side by side tasting.