monkeyhands
Member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2015
- Messages
- 9
- Reaction score
- 0
OK this is my first post on here so please don't shoot me down in flames if it sounds silly, also I have already tried searching the forums for an answer but got nothing, hence this post.
My question is this, how much of my equipment has to be sterile i.e free from bacteria. I have heard 2 theory's on this the first is that all equipment has to sterile and the second is that only everything that comes into contact with the wort after the boil has to be sterile on the basis that any bacteria picked up during mashing etc will be killed off during the boil therefore there is no need to make everything sterile prior to the boil part of the process.
I have done 3 whole grain brews now (have been using kits for years prior to this) and on each brew I have cleaned then sterilized all of my equipment for every part of the process i.e mash tun, sparging equipment, spoons, filters etc, as you can imagine this uses quite a lot of sterilizing chemicals so I was hoping to cut the sterile part down to just the equipment that comes into contact with the wort if possible.
Thanks for the help.
My question is this, how much of my equipment has to be sterile i.e free from bacteria. I have heard 2 theory's on this the first is that all equipment has to sterile and the second is that only everything that comes into contact with the wort after the boil has to be sterile on the basis that any bacteria picked up during mashing etc will be killed off during the boil therefore there is no need to make everything sterile prior to the boil part of the process.
I have done 3 whole grain brews now (have been using kits for years prior to this) and on each brew I have cleaned then sterilized all of my equipment for every part of the process i.e mash tun, sparging equipment, spoons, filters etc, as you can imagine this uses quite a lot of sterilizing chemicals so I was hoping to cut the sterile part down to just the equipment that comes into contact with the wort if possible.
Thanks for the help.