I don't have a direct answer to your question but you may find some value in this brulosophy exbeeriment:
http://brulosophy.com/2017/01/30/wa...he-impact-of-low-mash-ph-exbeeriment-results/
In the exbeeriment, Jake Huolihan compared mash ph values of 5.33 and 4.5, to see what difference it made.
Shockingly (to me at least) the final PH measures of the completed beers after fermentation were 4.14 and 4.17. There was an apparent difference in OG (1.054 to 1.050), and in FG (1.017 and 1.011). Each number here has the low PH mash first, normal PH mash second).
And when it came time to test whether there was a difference a panel of 22 tasters could discern, only 7 could pick out the odd beer in a triangle test, a figure quite consistent with random guessing.
Now, there are all the usual caveats with this (specific recipe, specific panel of tasters, would it be different if things were different), but I look at this and scratch my head a bit.
The low PH beer had better efficiency, it also had a higher final gravity. Perhaps the lower initial PH caused some yeast to drop out before it was done, who knows?
I've been looking at post-brew PH a bit lately wondering what if anything I might do to it. Not yet sure, but I'm a little less concerned about that after seeing this exbeeriment. It's only one time and all that, but it also caused me to be a little less concerned about hitting an exact mash PH.
YMMV, offer void where prohibited, you pays your money and you takes your chances.