• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

POLL : Do you typically do a secondary fermentation?

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

When brewing your favorite beer do you do a 2nd fermentation or just use primary?

  • Always do a secondary

    Votes: 14 13.7%
  • Never do a secondary

    Votes: 88 86.3%

  • Total voters
    102
Secondary is my glass.

IMG_0686.JPG


^^^10 days and 9 hours ago this was still grain. Cloudiness due to dry hopping in primary, not yeast.
 
I don't get to vote. :rolleyes: Sometimes I do a secondary and sometimes I don't. I used to just do a single fermentor, but lately I've been starting most of my beers in a bucket so I can top-crop the yeast, and to get the beer off most of the sediment. It also makes fining with gelatin easier. I move it to a carboy after about a week.

I don't use a bottling bucket, does that count?
 
The choices in the poll are kind of strict or even fundamental (I am not surprised because it seems to be such an opinionated topic) :p But it is no good for you to restrict your thinking and limit your choices to one method only. The situations are variable.
 
I am with schematix here: secondary is my glass everyt ime. I have never did a secondary, as I never thought it would help. I made plenty of beers with adjuncts like vanilla, cooca beans, coffee, lots of dry hopping, etc. and never thought to myself, that a secondary would help.
 
You need a third choice: I selectively do secondary fermentation. All my big beers spend time in a secondary (my 12% stout is in a keg as a secondary and will be for months....then it'll get racked to a serving keg).
 
43 replies and 88% say no secondary. I know the poll was a bit simple and their are many variables which might cause someone to use a secondary when they normally do not, but at least it tells me that a primary will suffice for most brews.
 
Unless you are racking over fruit/other ingredients or bottling, it's just another chance to oxidize and or infect your beer.
And another vessel to clean.
 
I only do a secondary if I'm planning on some extended aging. Mostly for big beers like Belgian Quads, or imperial stouts, and for lagers.
 
Did it for a big RIS I aged for 5 months, but that's the only reason I'll use a secondary for beer. I've used them for a few wines, to get it off the lees.

I get why many brew stores recommend using a secondary all the time. 1. Tell new brewers they need to use a secondary. 2. Sell them another carboy. 3. Profit.
 
There are only in a few cases where I use a secondary.
  • When I am adding fruit, so I will rack off the yeast cake and rack onto the fruit.
  • Aging big beers, like an American Barleywine on some oak chips.
  • When I am adding any other strange ingredients.
Otherwise, its just the one vessel and into the keg.
 
I quit brewing fruit beers years ago so I never use a secondary any more.

I agree. Only use a secondary if you are fermenting something that needs to be removed after a week or so, like fruit or some sort of spice.
 
I didn't secondary in past, but now I do. I've been bottling all my beer for the past 19 years and probably always will. For years I said "I don't mind a little haze in my beer". I've recently changed that tune. I want my beers as bright as the sun. I started doing secondaries again about a year ago and I'm happier with my results.
 
This is a really great read!
Tx to everyone who stepped up to the plate and replied to the OP

I always do a secondary but now I don't so anymore

Cabin
 
Almost always rack into carboys for a secondary fermentation. My primary fermenter is a 40 gallon cone and it is too big to cold crash in the fridge.

I like to get the beer off the lees when I do large batches as I think it clears and ages better, I often have kegs around for a year or longer.

Even “quick and dirty” beers like a hefe are less muddy with a secondary imho.

As far as this process being “ out of fashion”, how many arcane methods are you guys using just to make “authentic” beers from long ago? I know that bright, non- sour beer might seem quaint with all of the latest fads but that was the goal when I started brewing way back in 1995. So I will keep using this antique approach.
 
Back
Top