Congrats! Care to share your recipe, interested to hear what the grailbill was. I went the traditional triple decoctionroute, fun to try once, but not something I want to make a habit of.
I'm not sure what kind of sharing I can do at this point. I haven't closely read the fine print - yet. I think I can give a few detail though.
NO decoction!!!!!!. I added two specialty malts to compensate. I did do a step mash (direct heating), including a protein rest. I backed off on the Saaz, and added another good blending hop. I also added a little rye to give back some spiciness lost by dropping the Saaz. I was hoping to tweak the spicy character of the beer, and apparently it worked.
One question I still have is what were they looking for? When we got there, their little printed sheet we got suggested it was a "can you brew the perfect PU clone", and my heart sunk a little. Then the "organizer" a top Miller/Coors person (the PU distributor), said much the same, and again my heart sunk a little more. We decided though that, no, they said 15% artistic impression.
Mike had kindly brought an extra bottle of his version which he shared with us. His beer was definitely not a PU clone, but obviously pleased the judges enough to earn second (1st from one judge). I had thought my beer was definitely different from PU, and it is from what I am used to PU tasting like, but compared to what we were drinking at Hospoda, now I'm not so sure. I'll have a taste when I get home tonight.
Oh, and as they were judging, our group decided that if nothing else, it was ubber cool to have the head brewer of PU tasting our beers