• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Obnoxious Football Trash Talk Thread

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Brady clearly committed perjury. I'm not going to back that up but every single person who isn't a blind rabid Pats fan knows it.

(A) You can't commit perjury in an NFL arbitration hearing.

(B) Where is the proof he intentionally testified falsely?

The anti-Patriots hags are really having to dig deep into the muck on this one. They have to throw their lot in with Goodell and Pash and Kensil and the whole merry gang. Keep digging.
 
There's not even proof that they cheated.

what a delusional statement that is. Yeah, the pressure of the ball was under the amount that the rules state. It's like you guys in your echo chamber have convinced yourselves that facts are irrelevant.
 
Whoa whoa..:. No, no... They cheated alright!!!

Look at the table from the Wells Report!!

View attachment ImageUploadedByHome Brew1439410195.299436.jpg

You can CLEARLY see the by one of the gauges, 3 out of 4 balls were UNDER the required PSI limit.

I don't know how you explain that other than systematic, willful, and coordinated CHEATING from the QB down throughout every level of the organization!!
 
"The pressure of the ball was under the amount that the rules state!!!!"

Andrew Luck is..... a.... CHEATER!!!!!! Cheeeeeeeater!!!

What??? Like Luck doesn't know what the fkcuing PSI of the ball is!?!? Really!??!? Please. The guy throw's the ball!!!

Luck is such a whiney btich!!! He should just STFU and sit out a quarter of the season.
 
Now now Mr. Pats fluffer. Lets post the other part of the table..

slightly underinflated.. which could be explained with that temperature change you guys want to hold onto.. vs...... considerably underinflated. By both gauges.

Wells-Report-Table-of-Values.png
 
Right... And the Pats got fined, lost two draft picks and Brady is currently suspended for four games.

So... Is it just that the Pats are MORE guilty? Is that the new way it goes now?

Like Hoppy said... The pressure of the ball was under what the rules state.

So... The Colts just aren't AS guilty?? They're just a little guilty?? 3 out of 4 balls under by just a little... Bahhhh. That's totally fine. But the Pats... No.., they're over the magic "super guilty" threshold

Got it.

Thanks for clarifying.
 
And by the way... your whole bullshti argument around "ewww. You want to hold on to temperature change" only works when you lay that over the equally full-of-shto report that came out about "11 of 12 footballs being two lbs or more under".... Which was total crap.... as evidenced by the table you just posted.

If the Pats balls were set right at 12.5... The temperature and climate change DOES explain the drop.... just like you now magically say it suddenly explains why the Colts aren't huge cheaters.
 
****...I'd rather be locked in a room with Steelers and Cowboys fans than listen to another ****ing minute of Deflategate. Once you drive through Connecticut the entire ****ing country hates the Pats.
 
Right... And the Pats got fined, lost two draft picks and Brady is currently suspended for four games.

So... Is it just that the Pats are MORE guilty? Is that the new way it goes now?

Like Hoppy said... The pressure of the ball was under what the rules state.

So... The Colts just aren't AS guilty?? They're just a little guilty?? 3 out of 4 balls under by just a little... Bahhhh. That's totally fine. But the Pats... No.., they're over the magic "super guilty" threshold

Got it.

Thanks for clarifying.

nope. If the Colts balls were set exactly at 12.5 as per the rules and per one of the gauges. The slight difference could be through atmospheric changes and/or a slightly off guage. The Pats balls were no where close, but nice try.
 
Even if you give the Pat's the benefit of the doubt with the .3 to .4 variance in gauge calibration.. as a positive. They still are underinflated, whereas the Colts balls are not.
 
nope. If the Colts balls were set exactly at 12.5 as per the rules and per one of the gauges. The slight difference could be through atmospheric changes and/or a slightly off guage. The Pats balls were no where close, but nice try.

That's just incredibly stupid thinking right there.

Nobody ever claimed the Colts balls were prepped at the minimum 12.5 psi.
Maybe their Cromagnon QD likes his balls prepped at 13.5 psi.

Cheers!
 
That's just incredibly stupid thinking right there.

Nobody ever claimed the Colts balls were prepped at the minimum 12.5 psi.
Maybe their Cromagnon QD likes his balls prepped at 13.5 psi.

Cheers!

Only to a blind pats fan that is desperately trying to make the information fit their narrative.
 
If the Pats balls were set right at 12.5... The temperature and climate change DOES explain the drop.... just like you now magically say it suddenly explains why the Colts aren't huge cheaters.

The difference is one is clearly deliberate and the other isn't quite so clearly deliberate. Perhaps they did cheat as well, but there is zero way the Patriots incident is accidental. That said, we all know the Patriots are a bunch of cheaters and occasionally murderers so I don't really understand why people are still surprised. But at least their head coach wasn't hit on the head with a massive tree before the Super Bowl last year so there is that at least.
 
nodeflategate.jpg

So just imagine: Brady likes his balls a pound softer than Cromagnon, has his set to the league minimum while the hairy one has his set to one pound higher.

What that would mean to you idiots that can't do math is all of the PSIs (aside from one outlier ball that probably had a leaky valve) measured would then fall into Gas Law theory.

btw, isn't it interesting that the refs only checked four of Indy's footballs, and three of them were under the minimum pressure.

What about the other eight balls???

Cheers!
 
so if there's a dead guy in the street with a bullet hole in his head but you can't prove who did it...is there not a dead guy anymore?

Patriots cheated and just because there's only circumstantial evidence of who is responsible doesn't mean they didn't cheat. Right? Can you follow?

This has absolutely nothing to do with anything. So you can't prove who did it, so let's make every guilty because everyone could have done it. Or maybe it was a suicide.

There is a dead guy in your home town. You did it! No evidence needed. That is your argument as to why Brady should be suspended.

nope. If the Colts balls were set exactly at 12.5 as per the rules and per one of the gauges. The slight difference could be through atmospheric changes and/or a slightly off guage. The Pats balls were no where close, but nice try.

And you know the Colts set theirs to 12.5 psi just like you know Brady did it. Oh ok, gotcha :rolleyes:

Only to a blind pats fan that is desperately trying to make the information fit their narrative.

It is funny you haters keep bringing up Pats fans being blind. You haters can't show us any evidence that Brady deliberately had the balls deflated but you continue to say he is guilty.
 
View attachment 296012

So just imagine: Brady likes his balls a pound softer than Cromagnon, has his set to the league minimum while the hairy one has his set to one pound higher.

What that would mean to you idiots that can't do math is all of the PSIs (aside from one outlier ball that probably had a leaky valve) measured would then fall into Gas Law theory.

btw, isn't it interesting that the refs only checked four of Indy's footballs, and three of them were under the minimum pressure.

What about the other eight balls???

Cheers!

Oh but Brady has nothing to do with the pressure of the balls remember? Again, you are desperately trying to make the information fit your sad little narrative as the poor helpless cheating Pats victim.

I know I know... reality is hard for you guys, but try a little.
 
And everybody in the world (except for you knuckleheads) knows you cannot convict anyone about anything based on solely circumstantial evidence...

...which - btw - is suspect on its own merit...

Cheers!
 
And everybody in the world (except for you knuckleheads) knows you cannot convict anyone about anything based on solely circumstantial evidence...

...which - btw - is suspect on its own merit...

Cheers!

hmm.. didn't realize he was convicted of anything? oh wait.. he wasn't. He was given a punishment by the commissioner based on the evidence that was laid before him.
 
Still on this? Can't wait until the Pats' new cheating conspiracy is uncovered this year so we have something new to talk about...
 
hmm.. didn't realize he was convicted of anything? oh wait.. he wasn't. He was given a punishment by the commissioner based on the evidence that was laid before him.

Ah - nice circular argument - and based on an utterly obsequious assessment of reality to boot...

Cheers! (You'll never have to worry about Mensa giving you a call ;))
 
Back
Top