• Please visit and share your knowledge at our sister communities:
  • If you have not, please join our official Homebrewing Facebook Group!

    Homebrewing Facebook Group

Obnoxious Football Trash Talk Thread

Homebrew Talk

Help Support Homebrew Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Just saw a couple quick clips of the Pats parade... one of the signs in the crowd: "Sherman likes Nickleback".

That's funny right there... I don't care who you are.
 
NFL Network is replaying the Patriots total domination over the Seahawks.

"Best Background TeeVee Evah!"

Every time I watch this classic it's obvious Seattle loaded up with tall receivers so they'd have a fighting change to catch all the 50/50 balls their quarterback launches. Honestly, he'd be nothing with a receiving core loaded with Edelmans and Welkers.

Anyway...back to the game! I love the ending! :ban:

Cheers! ;)
 
and is then dragging the headphones behind himself. I don't know if anyone stuck a mic down Lynch's throat to ask him that tho. Check out the Matt Lauer interview with Carroll.
 
Sorry but there is no comparison between Bradshaw, Montana, and Brady because the table is nowhere near equal. Have you lost your freaking minds?

Not that I think Bradshaw was the greatest QB ever but he played in a time where many things were completely allowed not to mention the fairly significant steroid use making them mobile wrecking balls.

Montana is a little bit closer (not to mention a stellar QB albeit fed a bit of the Aikman benefits) in that things were cleaned up somewhat, *SOME* things were still kind of iffy though and they still took quite the beating.

Brady? Look, I don't hate the guy but the distance between the pansy kicker and the pansy @$$ QB have gotten much closer to each other. If you look at a QB and actually thinking about tackling them it would be a penalty now if they figure out how do recognize it. It's pathetic. All for a bunch of dip@#$%s that, quite frankly, appear to j@rk off over the scoreboard tally at the end of the game.... Sorry but you might as well send Brady out wearing a pink tutu and then wonder why people barely give a @#$%.

And can you honestly blame people for distancing themselves from the Pats given their record? You've all but virtually guaranteed adoption of the team by the least possible desirable fans watering down the percentage of quality fanbase to laughable parody. I don't blame NE but still, I can at least recognize the catalyst and it isn't the winning persay.
 
^^^ I'm pretty sure you're the only person, outside of his immediate friends and family, who has *ever* included Terry Bradshaw in the discussion of "Greatest QB Of All Time." Which basically renders everything else you said as meaningless.

Joe Cool versus Tommy Terrific? I don't know, and I don't particularly care. Montana was the best QB I saw for many years, but the game is different. So, you can't just look at their raw stats and compare them. But, you look at how consistently exceptional Brady has been, for so many years, with "weapons" at receiver some years and with discards and afterthoughts catching his passes other years.

And all that bull**** about "Brady in a pink tutu" is complete and utter nonsense. I can't quickly find current data, but going into the 2013 season Brady had been 88/91 in running the QB sneak for his career. Just about every game, it seems, they've got 3rd-and-1 or 4th-and-1. Brady gets the ball, and he gets the yard every ****ing time.

I tell you what - if Seattle and New England's roles had been reversed, and New England has the ball at the one yard line to win the game? That's a QB keeper and a New England victory. There's nobody tougher in the league when you absolutely need one yard - not Beast Mode, nobody.
 
Sorry but there is no comparison between Bradshaw, Montana, and Brady because the table is nowhere near equal. Have you lost your freaking minds?

Not that I think Bradshaw was the greatest QB ever but he played in a time where many things were completely allowed not to mention the fairly significant steroid use making them mobile wrecking balls.

Montana is a little bit closer (not to mention a stellar QB albeit fed a bit of the Aikman benefits) in that things were cleaned up somewhat, *SOME* things were still kind of iffy though and they still took quite the beating.

Brady? Look, I don't hate the guy but the distance between the pansy kicker and the pansy @$$ QB have gotten much closer to each other. If you look at a QB and actually thinking about tackling them it would be a penalty now if they figure out how do recognize it. It's pathetic. All for a bunch of dip@#$%s that, quite frankly, appear to j@rk off over the scoreboard tally at the end of the game.... Sorry but you might as well send Brady out wearing a pink tutu and then wonder why people barely give a @#$%.

And can you honestly blame people for distancing themselves from the Pats given their record? You've all but virtually guaranteed adoption of the team by the least possible desirable fans watering down the percentage of quality fanbase to laughable parody. I don't blame NE but still, I can at least recognize the catalyst and it isn't the winning persay.


LOL...

You're dumb.

It's funny to read your dumb words.
 
^^^ I'm pretty sure you're the only person, outside of his immediate friends and family, who has *ever* included Terry Bradshaw in the discussion of "Greatest QB Of All Time." Which basically renders everything else you said as meaningless.

Joe Cool versus Tommy Terrific? I don't know, and I don't particularly care. Montana was the best QB I saw for many years, but the game is different. So, you can't just look at their raw stats and compare them. But, you look at how consistently exceptional Brady has been, for so many years, with "weapons" at receiver some years and with discards and afterthoughts catching his passes other years.

And all that bull**** about "Brady in a pink tutu" is complete and utter nonsense. I can't quickly find current data, but going into the 2013 season Brady had been 88/91 in running the QB sneak for his career. Just about every game, it seems, they've got 3rd-and-1 or 4th-and-1. Brady gets the ball, and he gets the yard every ****ing time.

I tell you what - if Seattle and New England's roles had been reversed, and New England has the ball at the one yard line to win the game? That's a QB keeper and a New England victory. There's nobody tougher in the league when you absolutely need one yard - not Beast Mode, nobody.

I could almost agree with you until this last line of stupidity. :D
 
Tom Brady gets that one yard 99% of the time.

What was Marshawn Lynch's success rate this year, needing 1 yard to score? 1 for 5?

It's annoying that everyone, EVERYONE assumes that if they gave the ball to Lynch, he was automatically going to score. Nik had already blown him up earlier in the half. He's still got to get past Big Vinnie. Chandler Jones and Jamie Collins are two of the quickest DL/LB players in the league - those guys can get in the backfield in a heartbeat.
 
^^^ I'm pretty sure you're the only person, outside of his immediate friends and family, who has *ever* included Terry Bradshaw in the discussion of "Greatest QB Of All Time." Which basically renders everything else you said as meaningless.

And all that bull**** about "Brady in a pink tutu" is complete and utter nonsense. I can't quickly find current data, but going into the 2013 season Brady had been 88/91 in running the QB sneak for his career. Just about every game, it seems, they've got 3rd-and-1 or 4th-and-1. Brady gets the ball, and he gets the yard every ****ing time.

I tell you what - if Seattle and New England's roles had been reversed, and New England has the ball at the one yard line to win the game? That's a QB keeper and a New England victory. There's nobody tougher in the league when you absolutely need one yard - not Beast Mode, nobody.
In reverse order... You're deluded. He's a fine running back but if I wanted 1 yard at crunch time and I can choose anyone he isn't it.

Secondly, Brady actually gets a few yards here and there... There's a shocker. Because honestly what freaking defensive player would ever expect him to run it? He's a passing QB, always has been and always will be. Besides, who really wants to be kicked in the groin? He's still a pansy as most modern QBs are. He's just an extremely talented one when it comes to reading defenses and tossing the ball.

Thirdly, While I get the comparison since the three won 4 Super Bowls each, I point you to Cape's post for the Bradshaw thing......
Wasn't my origination...

LOL...

You're dumb.

It's funny to read your dumb words.
Funny, I say the same thing about yours...
 
I think you are overly exaggerating.....

Yeah-well-you-know-thats-just-like-your-opinion-man.jpg
 
Soooo.... when it comes out that the Colts were actually the ones that deflated that one ball....

Man... and you thought there were "fcku you"'s over the Super Bowl win?
 
Baldwin had tripped and was going down on that referee pick play in the end zone.

If Wilson waits a half-second Baldwin still goes splat but the ball ends up out of the end zone.

Game Of Inches...

Cheers!
 
Awwwwwwwfully suspect that 1 ball was within the limit, 10 were "just a tick" out of range which could easily be explained by the weather... And the ONE ball the Colts had in theor possession... After they apparently tipped off the NFL about it before the game.... jusssssst happened to be the ONE ball that was two full PSI under-inflated.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....

That makes me say, "hmmmmmmmmmmmmm"

I wonder how that ever could have happened. What an amazing coincidence.
 
I'm thankful the colts were able to bring this issue into the light of day for us to discuss like adults.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top