jwhirry
Member
Graff: I had pulled the Graff as I said I would last week and tested it, it was still a bit high for what I thought I had read off the recipe 1.012, rethought this later and realized this was the high side of my goal. But I already mixed up a starter with DME and 2 packages of Nottingham I found at a LHBS with different lot and exp from the failed packages I have. No problem reaching a good krausen in the starter, I pitched it and set it back in the fermentarator and tried to forget about it for a few days. Of course I looked, but I never noticed another krausen.
I should of left it alone in the fermenter for a lot longer (like maybe a couple more weeks) but it looked like it was clearing Thursday, I expected 2 weeks for fermentation max and I wanted the fermenter for an APA I was going to brew that day. Hydro had it down to about 1.011, I set it in my keezer to help it clear. Later I sanitized a keg and transferred the now cleared Graff. Sample tasted and smelled pretty good. Unfortunately my auto-siphon is giving me some trouble I have to say futzing with an auto-siphon in the middle of a transfer is not a good thing to do, and it took me a moment or more to notice I was drawing yeast and trub. I finished the transfer and set the carboy aside. I have since sampled the Graff and the aroma has changed A friend described it as hammy, I tried not to agree but I do. I cant find anything else better to describe the scent. I have been tossing the first glass to try and get a clear glass. The taste is dry cider but the smell is too hammy to enjoy it.
Should I just let it sit for a few weeks? Or should I transfer again, I doubt I transferred that much trub, but it is possible. Or should I try dry-hopping with an aromatic hop or spice that would compliment a cider or since it is in the keezer just add some apple juice or concentrate? I am even considering gelatin Otherwise I realize these are still fairly young and surely need a bit of time to develop. I have heard the cider aroma and taste may take a few weeks to return.
Comments on Nottingham need to be revised... I am afraid I shouldn't comment beyond saying that the first Lot# failed me, while the majority may not be having a problem, I am a bit shy of trusting Nottingham to my brews for the time being. Nottingham has a performance reputation that it did not meet this time, 72 hours of lag if it came to life at all and possible under attenuation if it did. Beyond that I had other yeasties in there so my comments are voided. I will have to play around with US-05 and US-04 to see how I like them in different brews.
I should of left it alone in the fermenter for a lot longer (like maybe a couple more weeks) but it looked like it was clearing Thursday, I expected 2 weeks for fermentation max and I wanted the fermenter for an APA I was going to brew that day. Hydro had it down to about 1.011, I set it in my keezer to help it clear. Later I sanitized a keg and transferred the now cleared Graff. Sample tasted and smelled pretty good. Unfortunately my auto-siphon is giving me some trouble I have to say futzing with an auto-siphon in the middle of a transfer is not a good thing to do, and it took me a moment or more to notice I was drawing yeast and trub. I finished the transfer and set the carboy aside. I have since sampled the Graff and the aroma has changed A friend described it as hammy, I tried not to agree but I do. I cant find anything else better to describe the scent. I have been tossing the first glass to try and get a clear glass. The taste is dry cider but the smell is too hammy to enjoy it.
Should I just let it sit for a few weeks? Or should I transfer again, I doubt I transferred that much trub, but it is possible. Or should I try dry-hopping with an aromatic hop or spice that would compliment a cider or since it is in the keezer just add some apple juice or concentrate? I am even considering gelatin Otherwise I realize these are still fairly young and surely need a bit of time to develop. I have heard the cider aroma and taste may take a few weeks to return.
Comments on Nottingham need to be revised... I am afraid I shouldn't comment beyond saying that the first Lot# failed me, while the majority may not be having a problem, I am a bit shy of trusting Nottingham to my brews for the time being. Nottingham has a performance reputation that it did not meet this time, 72 hours of lag if it came to life at all and possible under attenuation if it did. Beyond that I had other yeasties in there so my comments are voided. I will have to play around with US-05 and US-04 to see how I like them in different brews.