A process with ingredient list is a recipe and can be copywritten if printed.
From the US Copyright office:
Copyright law does not protect recipes that are mere listings of ingredients. Nor does it protect other mere listings of ingredients such as those found in formulas, compounds, or prescriptions. Copyright protection may, however, extend to substantial literary expressiona description, explanation, or illustration, for examplethat accompanies a recipe or formula or to a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook.
Only original works of authorship are protected by copyright. Original means that an author produced a work by his or her own intellectual effort instead of copying it from an existing work.
We may be saying the same thing, but I take this to mean you can't copyright a recipe - in making it so you can't follow that process. They can put other words to it, and publish it in a book or an article and copyright that. But they do not own the process or recipe. So I can physically brew the same thing, with the same techniques. Although you are right in that I cannot re-print it as my own for public use. But if you write down the process, I can sure as heck follow the same thing and brew my beer with the same process.
Except the Germans did it before Anchor and call it dampfbier.
Right, but Anchor did the one thing you can do to truly protect yourself as a brewing company, and trademarked calling it Steam beer. That is all I was pointing out. Thankfully no one trademarked Pale Ale back in the day.
If you master a science then you know every single thing there ever is to know about it. That is impossible, thus no masters of brewing truly exist. There are no masters, only students. Naming a piece of paper on a wall something doesn't change anything either.
Then sadly, I guess He-Man was not the Master of the Universe.