Kevin,
I don't understand your claimed difference between EBIAB and BIAB. I EBIAB and it is really no different at all for me. EBIAB is only as complicated as one wants to make it...it can be stupid simple.
1. Fire electric element to reach strike temp
2. Add grain and bag
3. Insulate pot / mash for an hour
4. Stir well and remove mash
5. Boil wort
I also don't understand the perceived need to add recirculation, pids, pumps, and now stir motors? I think it is great all the fancy EBIAB rigs that people build, I also have the means and DIY skills to build one, but I just can't see how a complicated EBIAB rig will make my beer taste any better, or my brew session any less labor? If anything, it just may make a little more work IMO.
The only advantage I see to a "sophisticated or smart" EBIAB system is consistency in the brewing process, but as a homebrewer consistency really isn't my goal. I find hitting mash temps and holding those temps to within a reasonable tolerance is not that difficult.
Please don't take this as a knock at those that prefer a more involved process, I just can't see the need or much added benefit to your definition of EBIAB, but mostly it is the "perceived need" that is presented on HBT that I take exception with, and feel many more folks would be enjoying the fruits of EBIAB if they only knew how simple it can be.
Sincerely,
wilser
Hello,
I do not take this as a knock, you have some good points.
I agree that for some people and or some peoples system it can be/is as simple as you stated above.
I have actually made a few early EBIAB batches as you state above and the beer was very good.
I actually miss the simplicity of my gas fired BIAB system when I did just what you are saying - heat water, put in bag/grain/stir/, put a sleeping bag over kettle, come back in 45-60 minutes, pull bag and fire up the burner and boil....but my EBIAB system does not work that well and I will never miss the roar of the gas burner and freezing my butt off.
That said -
My 2 or 3 goals with EBIAB can not be met with out some other system enhancements.... again my system and my goals.
My goals are -
to have un attended mashes for an hour
to have mash temps contstant for an hour with no temp stratification issues in the kettle
to not scorch the wort and make good beer (and make beer in doors
)
In order to meet these goals I tried doing nothing, using a pump and using a stir motor and varying my grain grind (ie grind 1, 2 or 3 times)
So far - the only way I have been able to meet my goals with my setup are to use a stir motor and grind one time.
To your point -
Is my beer going to be any better or worse if my kettle temps vary 6-7 degrees top to bottom? maybe not
Is my beer going to be be any better if my mash temps slide a degree or 3 over the 45-60 minute mash time... maybe not
My wort will NOT scorch if I stir and stir and stir by hand ... who wants to stir by hand when I can do something else with my time?
BTW my beer has scorched when I did not stir and ground too fine.
Do I sleep better knowing, to your point, my process is consistent and repeatable, you bet I do.
The OP asked about the what is better, a pump or a stir motor, I firmly believe a stir motor is the answer.
This is turning into a differnet conversation than what the OP asked, but a good one none the less.
thanks Kevin