boswell
Well-Known Member
Another case when 'keeping it real goes wrong'. Its cool 2 B real, accept when its wrong!
cadarnell said:i say write how you talk .. it may not be grammatically correct, but at least its real
Another case when 'keeping it real goes wrong'. Its cool 2 B real, accept when its wrong!
Yes, I also *speak* like I am illiterate and uneducated.
FWIW:
"real" - adj. - Actually existing as a thing or occurring in fact; not imagined or supposed.
Grammar actually occurs in fact and is not imagined, therefore speaking "real" would be speaking with proper grammar.
cadarnell said:just trying to keep it real .. liten up![]()
*pidgin
man, I'm a dick. Agree with your points though.
Jakemo said:You missed one:
Go help your uncle, Jack, off the horse.
The comma is necessary to indicate that you are naming your uncle.
(/pedant)
Franc103 said:Commas here would indicate you only had one uncle. Non-restrictive information.
Rephrasing works better. Dismount is a great word.
emjay said:The sentence doesn't need commas. It's about punctuation.
Go help your uncle jack off the horse.
Go help your uncle Jack off the horse.
See the difference? Sure, rephrasing will work too, but it misses the point entirely. Although, so does pointing out that it would mean you have only one uncle... as long as that's a possibility, the actual circumstances are irrelevant.
Franc103 said:I was commenting that adding an additional comma does not necessarily solve the problem as neatly as the contributor hoped. The point here, I read, is that commas can modify meaning. Adding an extra comma here has the possibility to change meaning in a different capacity. This example seems to be as much about capitalization as punctuation, perhaps more.
On second thought, I withdraw all of my comments. I teach and critique writing for a living, and I come to this site as part of a hobby. I am going to go read more about grain.
Franc103 said:I was commenting that adding an additional comma does not necessarily solve the problem as neatly as the contributor hoped. The point here, I read, is that commas can modify meaning. Adding an extra comma here has the possibility to change meaning in a different capacity. This example seems to be as much about capitalization as punctuation, perhaps more.
On second thought, I withdraw all of my comments. I teach and critique writing for a living, and I come to this site as part of a hobby. I am going to go read more about grain.